ABSTRACT
This research work is to study the
role of incentives and fringe benefits on employee’s productivity. Case studies of Greenfield Metals Ltd and
Aluminium-Gold Engineering Company Ltd.
From the course of the study, it was
discovered that majority of the employees accepted that:
1. Incentive and fringe benefit based on
performance can lead to increased productivity
2. Proper use of incentive and fringe
benefit as a motivational tool can lead to increased productivity.
3. If various incentives and fringe benefit
are applied, it can activate worker and thereby lead to greater output.
While the least number of the
employees seem not to know the criteria on which the management is using to
administer the incentive and fringe benefit.
It was on that that it was recommended to the management to make a copy
of the edicts/condition of service to every employee of the company so as to
enable them carry all the employees along, and the employees will equally know
their rights and entitlement when they become more committed to their job. And this definitely increases employee’s
productivity.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE OF PAGE i
Certification Page ii
Dedication iii
Acknowledgement iv
Abstract v
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of
the Study 1
1.2 History of the
Companies 3
1.2.1 Greenfield Metals
Ltd 3
1.2.2 Aluminium-Gold
Engineering Ltd 4
1.3 Identification
of Problem 5
1.4 Aims and
Objectives of the Study 5
1.5 Significance of
the Study 6
1.6 Scope of the
Study and Limitation 6
1.7 Hypothesis 7
1.8 Definition of
Terms 7
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE
REVIEW
2.1 The Concept of Organizational Incentives and Fringe Benefits 9
2.1.1 Incentives in an
Organization 9
2.1.2 Forms of
Organizational Incentives 11
2.1.3 Fringe Benefits
in an Organization 12
2.1.4 Forms of
Organizational Fringe Benefits 13
2.2 Motivation in
the Organization 15
2.2.1 Concept of
Employee’s Motivation 15
2.2.2 Incentives and
Fringe Benefit as Motivational Factor 16
2.2.3 Some theories of
Motivation 18
2.2.4 Application of
Motivation Theories to the Nigerian Workers 30
2.3 Productivity in
the Organization 32
2.3.1 The Concept of
Productivity 28
2.3.2 The
Motivation-Productivity Linkage 30
CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH
DESIGN
3.1 Design 40
3.2 Sample and
Sampling Procedure 40
3.3 Reliability and
Validity of the Instrument 41
3.4 Method of Data
Collection 41
3.5 Method of Data
Analysis 42
CHAPTER FOUR: PRESENTATION OF DATA
4.1 Composition and
characteristics of Respondent 43
CHAPTER FIVE: ANALYSIS OF DATA
5.1 The Chi-square
Values 51
5.2 Hypothesis
Testing 52
CHAPTER SIX: INTERPRETATION, MEANING, AND DISCOVERY
6.1 Hypothesis One 60
6.2 Hypothesis Two 60
6.3 Hypothesis Three 61
CHAPTER SEVEN: DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
7.1 Hypothesis One 63
7.2 Hypothesis Two 63
7.3 Hypothesis Three 65
7.4 Summary 65
Bibliography 67
Appendix 1 70
Appendix 11 71
Appendix III 75
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
A major determination of the success
of an organization is the effective management of the human resource, which is
the controller of all other resources available to the organization. The effective management of man will lead to
increase in his productivity, which translates to increase in the productivity
of the organization.
In discussing productivity, labour
productivity has always been of prime importance because all other factors of
production become productive only in association with labour. The need for the effective management of this
prime productivity factor is very crucial in Nigeria today. This is due to the abundant man power
resources facing limited capital in the country.
Man is a very complex being and
managing man to increase his productivity involves motivation, hence the
purpose of incentive and fringe benefit is to create conditions that will make
it possible for the workers to work with increased zeal and group moral
satisfaction can be effectively achieved.
Furthermore, labour productivity can
be influenced by using Mac Gregors theory X and Herzberg’s postulation.
Hence this paper is to study the
response of workers to the role of incentives and fringe benefits on employee
productivity using an Engineering Company and Mining Industry as case studies.
Therefore when a group of employees
are observed on the job, one may notice the differences in performance. Some people do an excellent job, while others
are marginal in their output. Some
employees come early, put in hard day’s work and stay late, while others are
always taking a break and are never around when needed. In some cases, the best worker may produce
two or three times as much as the poorest worker. How could these differences be explained? Well, obviously certain trait and abilities
are attributed to the productive employee.
The person may be intelligent,
aggressive and extroverted. But, there
is more than just ability. There is
something willful about the differences between the employees. Somehow, the productive employee is described
as more motivated or driven than the other person. Motivation as it is being described here
implies a willful act on the part of an individual. The employee may choose to try hard and to
exert a lot of effort or may choose just to get by (Akanni 1987: 242) and
thereby bring about increase output.
The purpose of motivation is to
create conditions in which people are willing to work with zeal, interest and
enthusiasm: with a high sense of responsibility, loyalty, discipline and pride
and with confidence in a most cohesive manner so that the goals of an
organization are achieved.
1.2 HISTORY OF THE COMPANIES
1.2.1 GREENFIELD METAL LTD