CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
of the Study
Agricultural sector was the main stay of the
Nigerian economy before independence and immediately after it, until the oil
boom of the 1970s. In the period before the 1970s, agriculture provided the
needed food for the population as well as serving as a major foreign exchange
earner for the country (Alabi and
Alabi, 2009). Most government policies have been directed towards
accelerating economic development with the ultimate aim of transforming the
economy into an industrialized one as well as the welfare of the population
(Obiechina, 2007), hence cannot be attained without drastic boost in
agricultural sector which is expected to act as a catalysts towards the realization
of this goal. The traditional role of agriculture in economic development
provides the foundation for this position. The role includes product
contribution, market contribution, factor contribution and foreign exchange
contribution (Johnston and Mellor, 1961).It is the main source of food for most
of the population. It provides the means of livelihood for over 70 percent of
the population, a major source of raw materials for the agro-allied industries
and a potent source of the much-needed foreign exchange (Alabi, Aigbokhan and Ailemen,
2004).
Rice is one of the world’s most important
food crops that serve as a stable food for a large percentage of the world’s
population, especially in India, China, other parts of Asia, and Africa. In
Nigeria, rice is a vital food consumption staple but has also become an
important cash crop where it provides employment for more than 80% of the
population in the major producing areas (Okoruwa and Ogundele, 2006). Ayinde et
al.(2009), drawing on WARDA (1996), note that Nigeria is both the largest
producer and consumer of rice in the West African sub-region. Moreover, Nigeria
consumes considerably more rice than it produces (Business Day, 2009), leading
to significant imports in recent years (Table 1 – appendix iii).
Over the years, several
government programs have attempted to stimulate domestic rice production with
the goal of addressing the increasing demand-supply gap and making Nigeria more
self sufficient in rice amongst which two of the most recent programs are the Presidential
Initiative on Rice (PIR), established in 1999 and the National Program for Food
Security (NPFS). There have also been trade policies constituting periods
of bans and tarrifs aimed at encouraging
local rice production. Despite these policies and programs, domestic rice
consumption has continued to outpace domestic production leading to an
ever-increasing role for rice imports. As can be seen from Table 1, rice
imports have been growing steadily in Nigeria and this growth is expected to
continue due to increasing demand resulting from growth in incomes,
urbanization, and the associated expansion of fast food restaurants (Daramola,
2005).
In general, of the estimated 5 million metric
tons of annual rice consumption in Nigeria, the annual domestic output of rice
still hovers around 3.0 million metric tons, leaving the huge gap of about 2
million metric tons annually, a situation, which has continued to encourage
dependence on importation. Some of the reasons for the gap are connected with
the improper production methods, scarcity and high cost of inputs, rudimentary
post – harvest and processing methods, inefficient milling techniques and poor
marketing standards particularly in terms of polishing and packaging. Also poor
or low mechanization on rice farms means heavy reliance on manual labor to
carry out all farm operations Daramola (2005). Another reason is that imported
rice is viewed as of better quality than locally produced rice, and that
therefore domestic and imported rice are not perfect substitutes. Yet another
explanation is that the long history of consuming imported rice in Nigeria has led
to habit persistence and consumption inertia, which makes it more difficult for
locally produced rice to compete with imported rice, Akaeze (2010). Achieving
sustainable economic development in Africa will confront three central challenges:
alleviating wide spread poverty, meeting current and future food needs, and efficiently
using the natural resource base to ensure sustainability.
Nigeria’s population is estimated at 160
million with an annual growth rate of about 4%, World Bank (2010). Nigeria must
then draw lessons from the Malthusian theory as well as follow the Human
Capital led growth formula of the Asian Tigers (Singapore, Taiwan, Malaysia) by
drawing on comparative advantages in production and import substitution cum
export promotion strategies of trade. This means self sufficiency in food which
is currently lacking following that the country currently imports much of her
food needs to meet local consumption demand. The implication of Nigeria’s food
import as opposed to export is becoming ever more crucial to growth and
development. The thrust of this paper is to ascertain the impact of rice
importation on rice production in Nigeria.
1.2 Problem
Statement
The
need for a country to attain self sufficiency in food as a panacea for economic
development cannot be over emphasised as it is one of the Millennium
Development Goals (MDG). Simply put, Nigeria has been clamoring for growth but
much of her policies have been targeted at macroeconomic indices such as
inflation, Balance of payments, exchange rates, debt profile and so on while
little attention has been given to the agricultural sector.