Abstract
Nigeria’s external debt, including its size, structure, source, type, and composition. The work analyzes the indexes for measuring the debt burden and examines alternative debt scenarios. It distinguishes between the internal and external factors influencing external debt accumulation, identifies the changes in the international environment necessary to alleviate the debt burden, and examines the relationship between export performance and the debt burden. After reviewing the structure of the Nigerian economy and its political history, the work concludes that Nigeria’s debt crisis is the result of structural defects inherent in the economy since independence. The work finds that the indicators of the debt burden have been relatively high. The behavior of these indicators, under varying assumptions, is explored using a growth-cum-debt model. The external and internal causes of debt accumulation are tested econometrically, and the results show the most important variables to be the real effective exchange rate and the terms of trade. The work ends with some policy prescriptions for dealing with the debt crisis.
TABLE
OF CONTETNS
TITLE ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… i
CERTIFICATION …………………………………………………………………………………… ii
DEDICATION………………………………………………………………………………………… iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ……………………………………………………………………….. iv
ABSTRACT ……………………………………………………………………………………………. v
TABLE OF CONTENTS …………………………………………………………………………. vi
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
of the Study ……………………………………………………………… 1
1.2 Statement
of Problem …………………………………………………………………….. 3
1.3 Research
Questions ………………………………………………………………………… 5
1.4 Objectives
of the Study…………………………………………………………………… 5
1.5 Research
Hypotheses ……………………………………………………………………… 6
1.6 Significance
of the Study ………………………………………………………………. 6
1.7 Limitations
of the Study ………………………………………………………………… 7
1.8 Definition
of the Terms ………………………………………………………………….. 8
References
…………………………………………………………………………………… 10
CHAPTER TWO
REVIEW OF RELATED
LITERATURE
2.1 Review
of Nigeria’s Foreign Debt ………………………………………………….. 11
2.1.1 Definitions of Foreign
Debt ………………………………………………………….. 15
2.2 Concept
of Foreign Debt ………………………………………………………………. 16
2.3 Genesis and Structure of Nigerian External Debt ………………..17
2.4 Factors that Contribute to Nigeria’s External Debt ………………………. 20
2.5Economic Growth and External Debt: Empirical Review ………………………… 24
2.6 Sources of Public Borrowing ………………………………………………………. 26
2.7 Approach to Solving Nigeria’s External Debt Problems …………….. 28
2.8Debt Reduction Operations and Nigeria Foreign Debt Experience … 32
2.9 Future Voluntary Debt Reduction Operations and Management .. 44
2.10 Government Creditors and the Paris Club ……………………………. 50
2.11Types of External Debt Financing ………………………………………………………. 56
2.12Importance of Debt Management on the Economy ………………………… 61
2.13Objectives of Debt Management ………………………………………………………… 63
References
…………………………………………………………………………………… 67
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH DESIGN AND
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research
Design …………………………………………………………………………… 70
3.2 Sources
of Data ……………………………………………………………………………. 70
3.3 Population
and Sample Size …………………………………………………………… 71
3.4 Techniques
of Data Collections ……………………………………………………… 71
3.5Data Analysis Techniques ……………………………………………………………………. 71
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND
ANALYSIS
4.1 Introduction
………………………………………………………………………………… 73
4.2 Presentation
of Data …………………………………………………………………….. 73
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1Summary of Findings ………………………………………………………………………….. 79
5.2 Conclusion
………………………………………………………………………………….. 80
5.3 Recommendations
………………………………………………………………………… 82
BIBLIOGRAPHY
………………………………………………………………………. 83
APPENDIX
………………………………………………………………………………… 87
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
It is generally expected that developing
countries, facing scarcity of capital, will acquire external debt to supplement
domestic saving. The rate at which they borrow externally—the
“sustainable” level of foreign borrowing—depends on the links among
external and domestic saving, investment, and economic growth. The main lesson
of the standard “growth with debt” literature is that a country
should borrow externally as long as the capital thus acquired produces a rate
of return that is higher than the cost of the foreign borrowing. In that event,
the borrowing country is increasing capacity and expanding output with the aid
of foreign savings (Bernal, 1987:155).
In theory, it is possible to calculate the
sustainable level of foreign borrowing, based, for example, on the terms,
maturity, and availability of foreign capital. In practice, however, the task
is nearly impossible, since such information is not readily available. Thus,
various ratios, such as that of debt to exports, debt service to exports, and
debt to GDP (or GNP), have become standard measures of sustainability. Even
though it is difficult to determine the sustainable level of such ratios, their
chief practical value is to warn of potentially explosive growth in the stock
of foreign debt. If additional foreign borrowing increases the debt-service
burden more than it increases the country’s capacity to carry that burden, the
situation must be reversed by expanding exports. If it is not, and conditions
do not change, more borrowing will be needed to make payments, and external
debt will grow faster than the country’s capacity to service it (Ajayi and Kahn
2000: 23).
According to
Afxentiou, and Serletis (1996: 30), countries in sub-Saharan Africa have
generally adopted a development strategy that relies heavily on foreign
financing from both official and private sources. Unfortunately, this has
meant
that for many countries in the region the stock of external eternal debt has
built up over recent decades to a level that is widely viewed as unsustainable.
For example, in 1975 the external debt of sub-Saharan Africa amounted to about
$18 billion. By 1995, however, the stock of debt had risen to over $220
billion. The
standard
ratios reflect this huge build up of debt. The region’s aggregate debt -export
ratio rose from 51 percent in 1975 to about 270 percent in 1995
(excluding
South Africa, the ratio was above 300 percent). For all low- and middle-income
developing countries, the average ratio of debt to exports was less than 150
percent. Similarly, the debt -GNP ratio for sub-Saharan Africa was 14 percent
in 1975, but by 1995 it had reached more than 74 percent. Although debt-service
ratios have remained relatively low because of the highly confessional nature
of external financing provided to Africa, many countries in the region have
been unable to service their debt without recourse to rescheduling under Paris
Club arrangements or by accumulating arrears.
The massive growth in external debt in
sub-Saharan Africa over the past two decades has given rise to concerns about
the detrimental effects of the debt on investment and growth, principally the
well-known ” debt overhang” effect. Furthermore, there is now
considerable evidence that the build up in debt was accompanied by increasing
capital flight from the region. In other words, sub-Saharan Africa was
simultaneously an importer and an exporter of capital.
Service delivery by key institutions
designed to mitigate the living condition of vulnerable groups were hampered by
decaying infrastructure due to poor funding. By cutting down expenditure on
social and economic
infrastructure,
the government appears to have also constrained private sector investment and
growth through lost externalities. This has reduced total investment, since
public investment is significant proportion of the total investment in the
country.
External debt arises mainly when a
given country’s imports is greater than its exports. So this debt arises directly because of the
imbalances between balance of trade and balance of payment, or indirectly when
a country borrows from richer or wealthy country/bodies in order to finance
their mentioned imbalancement.
And debt, especially external one usually has a devastatic gametic, macro-economic effect. Yes it’s what portrays any nations stand and image before other nations in the international community. As was the case of my country Nigeria, when it began to experience this cankerworm called external debt. This was as a result of fall in the price of the almost mono-export product of my country called crude oil, in the early 1980’s. Things really meant too bad for the inhabitants of my country. Just because of export is less than import. What factors lead to its failure? What has been the impact of this external debt in the Nigerian economy? These and other things is what really this project is set up to research on.