CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
The subject of
discovering the best performance being achieved whether in an organization by a
competitor or by an industry in the 21st century strategy needed to
gain competitive edge in an increasingly globalised business environment.
Sequel to fierce competitions that ensued in the banking industry before
recapitalization and consolidation as well as banks distress and failure, it became
the preoccupation of – Central Bank of Nigeria, to sanitize and control
activities of banks in a survival strategy of merger and acquisition of banks.
Banks after recapitalization and consolidation are constantly in search of ways
and means to improve their operational performance and profitability. This is
because operational performance has a high relevance for banks and leads to
increase profitability. However it is
worthy of note that in banking, significant differences with regard to
operational performance can be identified since operational performance is
strongly linked to processes and the way they are designed and executed.
(Akingbola, 2001). An attempt at correcting inefficiencies in banks (i.e.
performance gap in comparison to the
best practice) make for
the adoption of two distinct ways
of closing performance
gap ;
Firstly, the process flow that can change and design
related inefficiencies in resource commitment. This means that a process can be
improved upon through changing its structure and design. Secondly, intrinsic
inefficiencies that can be eliminated by improving the quality of manual and
automatic processing activities that can be reduced by adjusting the execution
quality to a best practice level, (Akingbola, 2001). Thus, the first noticeable
trend in the sector is bank’s quest for administrative structures that
encourage quality service delivery, expanded marketing to winning new customers
and retaining the existing ones in a lower cost and effective synergies, hence
the need of banks surviving policies through benchmarking. At this, benchmarking serves as a
management’s guide to creating a competitive advantage in a highly competitive
industry and environment especially in satisfying customer’s expectations and
market share.
Benchmarking is an improvement tool which an
organization uses to measure its performance or process against other
organizations’ best practices determines how those organizations achieved their
performance levels and uses this information to improve its own performance.
In effect, benchmarking when considered as a
competitive edge by an organization could assist her sustainable development
and growth.According to Roger (1999:203) benchmarking is not all about
performance but cooperation of studied partners as well as process and
practices. To him, the three types of benchmarking are metric, diagnostic and
process. The metric benchmarking
provides indications of relative performance
and perhaps identifies leading competitors, but it is unlikely to yield any ideas on how to change, diagnostic benchmarking
helps firms to identify and transfer improvement into their operations and strategies. While
process benchmarking is the most involving form of benchmarking, it is where
the most substantial benefits can be found. This includes operational,
functional and generic benchmarking. One thing clear about benchmarking is that
it encourages competition, which leads to varieties in goods and services as
well as desired standards. Following differences in circumstances in other
industries, benchmarking often results in creative imitation and the adoption
of new practices that overcome previous industry barrier.
To Oakland (2003), benefits in benchmarking are specially those of targets, priorities and operations that will lead to competitive advantages in products and among organizations. The efforts usually are realized in a search for best practices, those that lead to superior performance, through measuring performance, continuously implementing change and emulating the best. Similarly, benchmarking is useful for; understanding competition, ideas from proven practices, many options, superior performance market reality, objective evaluation, credible proactive, solving real problems and understanding outputs based on industry best practices. In the banking industry, benchmarking to Nwadibia (2001: ) has improved service delivery through banks. In other words, benchmarking in banks as a process of wanting to retain confidence of customers on their deposits has been beneficial as tools to banks in improving on their benefits. Aside from this, banks are expected to regularly provide quality services using the continuous improvement cycle in the entire operating department where no body should be exempted. This study therefore accepts that benchmarking when appropriately administered promotes a climate for change by allowing employees to gain an understanding of their performance what they are achieving now and how they compare to others in order that they become aware of what they could achieve.
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
Development and improvement
in the banking industry has been a lot of concern to the stakeholders globally.
Every day, each bank try to device a better way of offering services to the
public that is very unique. At the same time the competitors in the industry
try to do exactly the same but in a different and betterway, this is to ensure
customer retention and new customer’s attraction for the profitability and
continuity of the business. This brought the issue of benchmarking. In Nigeria
as it is been practiced, benchmarking had been faced with a lot of challenges
that most banks and some other organization find it seriously difficult and
sees it herculean task some of the challenges are as follows: