ABSTRACT
The study
aims at examining the impact of Asset Liability Management on non-interest
income structure of Deposit Money banks in Nigeria for the period of Year 2011
to Year 2015. The study reviews the role of non-interest income in the present
day Nigeria banking system.
The study adopts a trend analysis of non-interest income, non-interest income as a proportion of banks’ net interest income and the extent to which banks’ asset liability management have any significant impact on the extent to which non-interest income is a significant component of banks’ aggregate performance. To achieve these, variables for asset liability management and non-interest income were obtained from Obrimah (2015) and DeYoung (2013) respectively. The study makes use of ordinary least square (OLS) technique for analyzing the regression model.
Empirical
findings show banks’ asset liability management have impact on the extent to
which non-interest income is a significant component of banks’ aggregate
performance. Evaluations of non-interest
income show that foreign exchange fees form the highest source of non-interest
income followed by fees relating to lending.
Also, reduction in Commission on Turnover by Central Bank of Nigeria
from 5 per mille to 1 per mille (now replaced with account maintenance)
presently did not reduce non-interest income.
Conclusively,
bank’s size do not have positive relationship with non-interest income.
Non-interest income as a proportion of banks’ net interest income reveals that
banks categorized as small such as Fidelity bank, Stanbic IBTC, Sterling and
Diamond had higher value of proportion of Non-interest Income to Net Income
than First bank, Zenith bank, GTbank and Access bank. An important implication of our findings is
that large Deposit Money banks large banks may be overlooking opportunity to
generate non-interest income. Hence,
large DMBs should not under-utilize their assets so as to generate more
non-interest income.
Keywords: Deposit Money banks, Non-interest Income, Asset Liability Management (ALM), Commission on Turnover
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
- Background
to the Study
Banks
are very important organizations which help in the execution of socio-economic
activities engaged by individuals, business organizations and even sovereign
states. They serve primarily as a medium which bridges the gap between surplus
and deficit units in an economy. This fundamental function of banks generate
interest income which has over the years been the major source of revenue,
since loans form a greater portion of the total assets of banks. These assets
generate huge interest income for banks which determines their financial
performance (Mabvure, Gwangwava, Faitira, Mutibvu &Kamoyo, 2012). In recent times, developments in
information and communication technology, increased competition among banking
companies as well as the complexity and diversity of businesses and their
demands for financial services have compelled banks to consider other banking
activities which offer numerous services to clients and boost revenue via fee
income generation.
The
term non-interest income refers to income earned from sources other than
returns on advances or loans to bank clients. They are usually fee or commission
generating activities which range from cash management to underwriting
activities and custodial services as well as derivative arrangements. As part
of total bank earnings, non-interest income is gaining prominence in recent
times particularly in the US and Europe, as competition continues vigorously in
the traditional banking business of deposit mobilization and loan making.
On the other hand, asset liability management (ALM) is a dynamic process of planning, organizing, coordinating and controlling assets and liabilities – their mixes, volumes, maturities, yields, and costs in order to achieve a specified business objective. The ALM system has different functions to manage risks such as market risk management, trading risk management, liquidity risk management, funding and capital planning, profit planning and growth projection (Kosmidou & Zopounidis, 2004). It enables the banks to make symmetry business decisions in a more informed framework through risks. It is an integrated approach that covers both types and amounts of financial assets and liabilities with the complexities of the financial market.