Abstract
This project work studied the effect of terrorism in developing countries as it has to do with development and progress. It laid emphasis on selected officers of the state security service (SSS), Public servants and some personnel in the international relation. The aim of this work is to study how best on the most effective means of allowing the freedom of special, religion, expression etc, in a country without jeopardizing the efforts of our leaders. The researcher collected data from primary as well as secondary sources using a well constructed questionnaire and direct interview which he administered systematically with the use of simple percentage, the findings based on test result include that the impact of terrorism does not affect the development and progress of developing countries. Rather its impact is felt more by developed countries who are their prime target in view of this, it is important to note that when the elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers. So when the developed countries suffer from the impact of terrorism, the developing countries suffer most.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
Page i
Approval
Page ii
Dedication
iii
Acknowledgement
iv
Abstract
v
Table
of content vi
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction 1
- Background of the Study 2
- Statement of the Problem 5
- Objectives of the Study 6
- Research Question 7
- Research Hypothesis
- Significance of the Study 8
- Scope of the study 9
- Limitation of study 11
- Definition of Term 11
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 Literature Review 14
2.1 Introduction 14
2.2 Meaning of Psychology 16
2.3 Decision- Making 20
2.4 Programmed 21
2.5 Non- programmed 22
References 25
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 Research Design and Methodology 26
3.1 Introduction 26
3.2 Research Design 27
3.3 Source/Methods of Data Collection 27
3.4 Method of data Analysis 28
3.4 Population and Sample Size 29
3.5 Simply Technique 30
3.6 Validity and Reliability of Measuring
Instrument32
3.7 Method of Data Analysis 33
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 Presentation and Analysis of Data 35
4.1 Introduction 35
4.2 Presentation of Data 35
4.3 Analysis of Data 36
4.4 Test of Hypothesis
4.4 Interpretation of Result 45
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 Summary, Conclusion and Recommendation 47
5.1 Introduction 47
5.2 Summary of Findings 52
5.3 Conclusion 54
5.4 Recommendations 56
Reference 63
Appendix 64
Questionnaire 65
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
When we talk of terrorism we have to bear
in mind that there is a very big difference between terrorism and freedom
fighting (terrorists and freedom fighters).
Both of them can be said to be fighting for their fundamental human rights. But while terrorists are faceless elements that come together and starts terrorizing the society. Freedom fighters are a group of people who are known and have gathered to press for their freedom.
Terrorists
does have definite location rather mix up with the society and start unleashing
their terror to women, children, the elderly as well as able bodied people.
The
emergence of terrorism is traced to bad governance. When people’s rights are
violated and trampled upon. When a section of the country feels marginalized there
is the chance of some people coming together to make the country insecure or
ungovernable.
Therefore, for the purpose of study the researcher’s focus is on pure democratic leadership style which allows the citizenry the freedom of expression so that there will not be friction between the leaders and followed by reducing such friction, there is bound to be peace.
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
“Terrorists
and terrorism” has become the world’s monomaniac over the years. The single
biggest threat to United States security both short-term, medium term and long
term problem. Bringing America to the picture is because of the fact that she
holds the world economy. Whenever America’s economy is threatened it affects
the whole world, especially the developing countries like Nigeria.
Terrorism
has become Washington’s major problem since the 9/11 terrorist attack which
prompted American to embark on foreign / military policy that saw the
development of about 94,000 U.S. troops, 40,000 N.A.T.O. troops and about
100,00 mostly highly paid contractors into Afghanistan. These numbers of troops
were assigned to crush the AI-QAEDA terrorist numbering not more than 100 and
15,000 partly and full-time irregulars associated with the Afghan Taliban
terrorists.
The
reason for the emergence of these terrorist groups is as a result of the Bush
Administration’s foreign policy in the Middle East. Over time now America has
been directing their resources in fishing out terrorist’s hideout instead of
aiding developing country like Nigeria now that Nigeria is facing security
challenge. America is no more concerned on our welfare as a people but on how
to label Nigeria a terrorist enclave. This security problem has brought untold
negative impact on our economic development and progress.
1.2 STATEMENT
OF THE PROBLEM
Sine
the concept of participation evolve from the field of human relation, it has
been misunderstood by many. Participation is therefore the act of one taking
part in something that affects him directly or otherwise. This is done in a
special way of delegation thereby allowing people to air their view in matters
that concern them.