ABSTRACT
It is an undeniable fact that trade has been facilitating growth and development of countries across the world. This underscores the recent upsurge in establishing multilateral trade relationship between Nigeria and other countries especially, the G8 member countries. While these realities are still contestable in terms of the potential benefits of the trade linkage that Nigeria stands to gain, the trajectory of the influx of export to Nigeria from the latter countries calls for a concern and a need to investigate the possible socio-economic, political and geographical variables that trigger this trend. It is in view of this, that this study empirically investigates the magnitude of the factors driving increasing Nigeria-G8 multilateral trade relations. To achieve this, we employ the augmented variant of gravity model (GM) that allows for the inclusion of country specific and country-pair characteristics in addition to the traditional GM variables (income and distance). We find that Economic Size, Population, the Geographical Landmass, Degree of Trade Openness, and Exchange Rate of the trading partners, drive multilateral trade flows between Nigeria and the G8 member countries. Therefore, promoting a broad-based diversification of the Nigerian economy is crucial for more beneficial Nigeria-G8 trade relations.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Pages
Title Page i
Certification ii
Dedication iii
Acknowledgement iv-v
Abstract vi
Table of contents vii-ix
List of tables x
CHAPTER
ONE
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Background of the study 1-3
1.2 Statement of the Problem 4-6
1.3 Objectives of the study 7
1.4 Research Hypotheses 7
1.5 Significance of the study 7
1.6 Scope of the study 8
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW 9
2.1. Conceptual framework 9
2.1.1 Understanding the concept of Trade integration 9-11
2.1.2 Globalization and Trade Integration 11-13
2.2 Theoretical Literature 13-17
2.2.1 Understanding the G8 and its Multilateral Relation 17-20
2.3 Empirical Literature 20-23
2.4 Limitations of Previous Studies 23
CHAPTER THREE
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Theoretical
Framework 24-25
3.2 Model
Specification 25-28
3.3 Estimation
Procedure 28-29
3.4 Data
Issues 29-30
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA
ANALYSIS AND RESULTS PRESENTATION
4.1 The basic Newtonian Form of Nigeria G8 Multilateral
Trade Gravity Model 31-32
4.2 The Augmented Nigeria G8 Multilateral Trade
Gravity Results 33-40
4.3 Model Specification 41-42
CHAPTER
FIVE
SUMMARY
OF THE STUDY, RECOMMENDATIONS ANDCONCLUSION
5.0 Summary of the Study 43-44
5.2 Policy Recommendation 44-45
5.1 Conclusion 46
References 47-53
Appendices 54-63
LIST
OF TABLE’S
Table1.1 Nigerian Trade with G8
Partners 2007 5
Table 3.1 The Sampled Countries used for the Study 30
Table
4.1 The basic
Newtonian form of GM for Nigeria
G8 Multilateral Trade Relations. 32
Table
4.2 Comparison of
the Pooled fixed effects and
Random effect GM for Nigeria G8 MT. 39-40
Table
4.3 Models
Comparison. 42
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Development
in international trade over the decades points to the fact that countries of
the world cannot live in isolation. A close look across different political and
economic climates of the world shows that this phenomenon has assumed a more
competitive and multi-dimensional scale. Lurking at the background of
multilateral trade relations is a quest to complement a country’s production
deficiencies or limited resources by exploring available opportunities in some
other countries. Global trade has
expanded significantly since World War II and many countries have benefited
from increased cross-border trade and investments for reasons which include: lower transportation and information costs,
higher per capita income and changes in government policies (Onwuka and
Eguavoen 2007 andKrol 2008). As a result, there is a
global call for more trade across borders. This call has elicited one of the
most enduring debates among policy makers in the world. Economists tend to believe that movements
toward trade relations among countries, on balance, provide positive benefits.
For instance, increased trade and investment flows help countries to develop
faster than it should as trade generates income and the flows enable them to
increase their stock of productive capital without compromising their level of
consumption (Onwuka and Eguavoen 2007).
It
is obvious that views would vary as some other economists like McCalman (2004) are of the opinion that
when countries embark on a process of unilateral (or multilateral) trade
arrangements, a period of backsliding is not far away. The main reason for this
skepticism is the existence of groups with vested interests in maintaining
tariff protection. Differences in
production costs within countries determine much of the flow of goods and
services across international borders in line with the concept of comparative
advantage but not every nation is a full member of the global village
especially, a developing country like Nigeria (Onwuka and Eguavoen, 2007).
Developing countries are losing out as they experience the worsening of
existing imbalances and distortions in the global economy which manifest in
form of unequal distribution of political, economic and military power. The
implication being that while global trade has created immense opportunities of
wealth for some, it has produced two contrasting global villages – one which
indeed is prosperous, rich and democratic for a few who live in it, and another
in which the majority are poor, alienated and marginalized with hardly any
voice to determine their own destiny (Collier and Dollar 2001, Zuma 2003).
Nigeria has trade relations with The
Group of Eight (The G8); a group described as the world’s “most powerful”
economic and political organizations in the world. The group participants have
consistently supported the role of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
(GATT), and since 1995 its successor, the World Trade Organization (WTO), in
monitoring multilateral trade agreements with a view to ensuring the openness
of the international trading system, and as a forum for negotiations (Ulrich 2006; Adler 2008). However,
it has been observed that Africa remains basically outside the global trading
and investment system. At the end of the 1990s, a decade of globalization in
finance and trade sees Sub-Saharan Africa still accounting for less than 2% of
world trade and received less than 1% of global capital flows. A majority of
the least-developed countries including Nigeria are in this category, and even
the “middle-income” countries have suffered severe declines in per capita gross
national product for year. (Wood and Browne, 2004).
The
main thrust of Nigeria’s trade policy is the integration of the economy into
the global market system(Briggs,
2007; Oyebanjo et. al. 2009).
This entails progressive liberalization to enhance competitiveness of domestic
industries; effective participation in trade negotiations to harness the
benefits of the multilateral trading milieu; promotion of transfer, acquisition
and adoption of appropriate technologies; and support for regional integration
and co-operation. Thus, the government
of Nigeria has a every opportunity reiterated its commitment to the principles
and objectives of the multilateral trading system (WTO,
2005).
In response, there has been a remarkable
increase in external trade and openness in the Nigerian economy over the two
decades and has even grown more rapidly in recent times, especially since 2002
(Obiora, 2009). Nigeria became a founding member of World Trade Organization
(WTO) with the coming into effect of the Marrakech Agreement establishing the
Organization, in January 1995. However, Nigeria’s involvement in the
multilateral trade system dates back to 1960, when the country formally joined
the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) after gaining independence
from colonial rule (Briggs, 2007). Trade openness has risen from just above 3%
in 1991 to over 11% by 2008. Direction of trade data indicates that the US, the
EU, and Brazil are Nigeria’s largest trade partners while US is Nigeria’s
single largest trade partner as it accounts for nearly 45% of Nigeria’s export.
However, oil exports account for the vast bulk of total exports (Briggs, 2007).
From
the forgoing, one cannot say with precision how Nigeria’s multilateral trade
activities especially with the G8, have fared or impacted on Nigeria’s economy.
This indeed is an empirical puzzle this work wants to investigate.
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM