ABSTRACT
Concentrations of 16 priority polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) were determined in 30 brands of Nigerian and imported pastas in Nigerian market. The pasta samples were categorised into (1) noodles (2) spaghetti and (3) macaroni. Analysis were performed by GC – MS after soxhlet extraction of the sample and clean up of the extract. The concentration of Σ16 PAHs in both the Nigerian and imported brands are in the range of 0.009 to 0.8 mgkg-1 and 0.002 to 0.007 mgkg-1 respectively. The Bap concentrations in 75% of the Nigerian samples were less than 0.001mgkg-1 permissible limit specified for processed cereal based food while all the brands of imported samples were below the maximum limit. The concentrations of Σ8 carcinogenic PAHs in both the Nigerian and imported brands ranged from 0.001 to 0.01 mgkg-1 and 0.001 to 0.004 mgkg-1 respectively. The Margin of Exposure based on PAH8 as an indicator for the occurrence and effects of PAHs in food for generally exposed individuals were less than 10,000 in 25% and 0% for child and Adult scenarios respectively for Nigerian brands. For typically exposed individuals, it were 38% and 0% for child and Adult scenarios respectively. For imported brands of pastas, the MOE values were far higher than 10,000 for generally and typically exposed individuals in both child and Adult cases. The MOE values indicate serious concern particularly for children who are consumers of Nigerian brands.
CHAPTER ONE
BACKGROUND
1.1
INTRODUCTION
The
introduction and distribution of man-made compounds or excessive amount of
natural compounds have created avenue to understanding the effects of
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on humans and the environment. It is
therefore, necessary to study the effects on individuals to population,
communities and environments. The contamination of food by chemical hazards is
a worldwide public health concern. Among organic contaminants, polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) represent an important class of food contaminants.1
Food can be contaminated from environmental source, industrial food processing and certain home food preparation.2 – 4 Humans are exposed to PAHs by various pathways. For non-smokers, the major route of exposure is consumption of food and it contributes to more than 90% of total PAHs exposures of the general pollution in various countries.5 – 7 Food contamination may also occur during periods of atmospheric pollution in which PAHs are deposited on seeds, fruits or vegetables, which are then consumed.7 – 9 Many studies have shown that cereals, vegetables10, oil and fat11 – 12 are the main contributors to the ingestion of PAHs. However, grilled or smoked fishes and meats show a relatively low contribution, except in specific cases or due to socio- cultural reasons that cause these foods to occupy a prominent place in the diet.7, 13- 14
Over
the years, different sources of PAH contamination of food have been found. Food
items and products could be contaminated by soils, polluted air and water.15
Some aquatic food products, such as fish, can be exposed to PAHs present in
water and sediments and the PAH content greatly depend on the ability of the
aquatic organisms to metabolize them.16
Furthermore,
in the food processing industry, food additives such as smoke flavouring
products (SFP), lubricants, solvents,
propellants, glazing agents and protective coating contribute to contamination
of food items by PAHs.17
The occurrence of PAHs in human foods reflects the conditions of the environment and consequences of some thermal treatments that are used during the preparation and manufacture of foods.66 The amounts and types of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compounds generated during thermal processing of foods depend on the temperature, oxygen availability, fuel type used, treatment duration, fat content and distance from the energy source.57 In areas remote from urban or industrial activities, the levels of PAHs found in unprocessed foods reflect the background contamination, which originates from long distance airborne transportation of contaminated particles and natural emission from volcanoes and forest fires. In the neighborhood of industrial areas or along highways, the contamination of vegetation can be ten-fold higher than in rural areas.18
In
general, PAHs are not present individually but in mixtures. Sixteen PAHs that
have be extensively monitored are the compounds included in the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (USEPA) list of priority organic pollutants.19 The 16 compounds are given in Table 1 along
with their abbreviation, molecular weight, Chemical abstract service (CAS) number
and structure. Of these 16 PAHs, Benzo [a] Pyrene (BaP) is probably the most
studied and has been widely used in environmental analysis as marker for the
entire PAH content.5
Different
approaches have been proposed for the assessment of the risk of PAH mixtures in
human foods which include the use of Benzo [a] Pyrene as a maker, the toxic
equivalency factor (TEF), margin of exposure (MOE).2, 20 These approaches have been evaluated and the
TEF was adjudged not scientifically valid because of lack of data on the oral
carcinogenicity studies on the individual PAHs, their mode of actions and
evidence of poor productivity of the carcinogenic potency of PAH mixture based
on the current proposed TEF values.2, 5, 15 In 2008, the CONTAM Panel of EFSA concluded
that the use of BaP as indicator of
occurrence and effects of PAHs in food is not suitable and suggested that the
eight higher molecular weight PAHs (PAH 8): Benz[a] anthracene, Chrysene,
Benzo[a] Pyrene, Benzo [b] fluoranthene, Benzo [k] fluoranthene, Dibenz [a,h]
anthracene, Benzo [g,h,i] perylene and indeno [1,2,3-c,d] pyrene and a sub
groups of four PAHs (PAH 4: Benz[a] anthracene, Benzo[a] Pyrene, Benzo[b]
fluoranthene, and Chrysene) are the most suitable indicators of occurrence and
effects of PAHs in food. It was also suggested that the margin of exposure
(MOE) approach should be used for assessment of risk exposure.2
Table 1: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons considered in the
present study.
Compound | Abbr. | Mw | CAS | Structure |
Acenaphthene | Ace | 154.2 | 83-32-9 |
|
Acenaphthylene | Acy | 152.2 | 208-96-8 |
|
Anthracene | Ant | 178.2 | 120-12-7 |
|
Benz
|
Abbr:
Abbreviation, Mw: Molecular weight, CAS: Chemical Abstract society service
number
1.2 GENERAL
OBJECTIVE