TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Title
page i
Certification
Page ii
Dedication iii
Acknowledgements iv
Table
of Contents v
List
of Tables vi
Abstract vii
CHAPTER ONE: Introduction 1
Statement of the Problem 18
Purpose of the Study 20
Operational Definition of Terms 20
CHAPER TWO: Review of Related Literature 22
Theoretical Review 22
Organizational identification theory 22
Social exchange theory 25
Role identity theory 27
Self determination theory 29
Empirical Review 31
Job Resources and Extra-role Behaviour 31
Psychological Empowerment and Extra-Role Behaviour 33
Organizational Justice and Extra role behaviour 35
Summary of Literature Review 37
HYPOTHESES 38
CHAPTER
THREE: Method 39
Participants 39
Instruments 39
Procedure 41
Design and statistics 42
CHAPTER
FOUR: Result 43
Summary of Results 44
CHAPTER FIVE: Discussion 45
Implications of the findings 46
Limitations of the study 47
Suggestions for further study 48
Conclusion 49
Recommendations 49 REFERENCES 50
APPENDICES
LIST
OF TABLES
Table
1:
Description of the Study Respondents
Table 2: The
results of Multiple Regression Test on Job Resources, Psychological Empowerment
and Organizational Justice as Predictors of Extra Role Behaviour among Nigerian
Police Officers.
ABSTRACT
This study
examined job resources, psychological empowerment and organizational justice as
predictors of extra-role behaviours among Nigeria police officers. A total of 250
particitants comprising 154 male and 96 female, 162 married and 88 single, 110
old and 140, and 98 with high qualification and 152 police officers with low qualification. Job
demand/resources scale was to measure job resources, psychological empowerment
scale was used to measure psychological empowerment, organizational justice was
measure with organizational justice scale and extra-role behavior scale was
used to measure extra-role behavior. A
cross-sectional survey design was used. Multiple regressions analysis was used
to analyze the data. The psychological empowerment independently, had a
positive impact/prediction on extra role behaviour with a β value of .124,
which is statistically significant since the P-value < .05 and t= 2.076.
Whereas, job resources and organizational justice have no impact/prediction on
extra role behaviour with a β value of .004 and -.041, which were statistically
not significant since the P-values >.05 and t= .209 and -1.547 respectively.
The results were discussed and recommendations were made in light of the
findings.
CHAPTER
ONE
Introduction
The
notion of giving something extra back to an organization fits well with
research on non-traditional aspect of work behaviour referred to in the
literature generally as extra role behaviour (Organ & Konovsky, 1989;
Schnake, 1991; Smith, Organ, & Near, 1983).
Extra-role
behaviours are in two categories: organization-oriented and
people/co-worker-oriented (Zhu, 2013). The organization-oriented extra-role
behaviour behaviour refers to adherence to non-formal norms formed in the
organization and extra effort to improve outcomes, while the people-oriented
includes conveying useful information to the colleagues and the cooperation
effort as well as helping them (Resick, Giberson, Dickson, Wynne, & Bajdo,
2013). The focus of this study is on extra-role behaviour in the Nigeria police
force.
The importance of extra-role
behaviours in the workplace are enormous, especially in the Nigerian Police
Force: For many years, scholars have recognized the significant impact of
extra-role behaviour on the success of an organization. As several authors have
noted (George, 1996; Organ & Konovsky, 1989), extra-role behaviour provides
the organization with additional resources and removes the need for expensive
formal mechanisms otherwise crucial to successful restructuring processes.
Extra-role behaviours give opportunity for innovative behaviours (Xerri &
Brunetto, 2013), it increases organizational effectiveness; increase in work
quality, reduction in the cost of hiring external hand, and even client
satisfaction (Podsakoff, Whiting, & Blume, 2009). It can make the employees
to have a better understanding of their job especially newly recruited officers
that will be attached to a boss (Senior Officer/colleague); Teh and Yong (2011)
term it as organizational learning.
One may ask how could we stimulate
or make Nigeria Police Officers extra-role behaviour if they have not been
engaging in it, or when there is decrease in the level of discretionary
behaviours among Officers? According to Ilies, Scott and Judge, (2006);
Greguras and Diefendorff (2010) extra-role behaviour or organizational
citizenship behaviours are strongly dependent on the subject’s disposition
(personality, emotions etc), officers conduct (Cohen, 2006), organizational
justice (Niehoff & Moorman, 1993, Fassina, Jone & Uggerslev, 2008),
management style (Organ, Podsakoff & Mackenzie, 2006) and the functioning
of the organization (Britt, Mckibben, Greene-Shortridge, Odle-Dusseau &
Herleman, 2012).
According to George and Brief (1992), all of these types of behaviours
(e.g prosoical, spontaneous organizational behaviour, etc) refer to the
additional things people do at work that are beneficial to the organization but
the workers are not mandated to do them. For example, workers choose throughout
the day whether to help co-workers, to share insight on improvements, and in
general, to do what is needed to help their organization perform smoothly and
productively. Several researchers have argued that extra role behaviour is
especially suitable material for reciprocity, because, workers have much
discretion in performing it, whereas traditional, in-role behaviours such as
productivity are primarily a function of work processes and workers abilities (Konovsky
& Pugh, 1994; Moorman, 1991; Organ, 1988). Extra role behaviours are discretionary
behaviours that are not enforceable requirements of an employee’s job (Van
Dyne, Cummings & Parks, 1995).
Organ (1988) emphasized the
discretionary nature of extra-role behaviour when he defined it as constructive
behaviour not included in an employee’s formal job description, such as
assisting co-workers with their work, helping peers learn new task,
volunteering to do things that benefit their work groups and orienting the new
workers. Since these behaviours are not required by the job, there is no formal
sanction for not engaging in them. Thus, extra role behaviour can be viewed as
a behavioural indicator of workers’ responses to their employment relationship
(Organ 1988).
Extra-role behaviour goes beyond and above
the call of duty, that is discretionary and not explicitly recognized by the
employing organization’s formal reward system, and that contributes to
organizational effectiveness (Organ, 1988; Smith, Organ, & Near 1983).
Extra role behaviour is desirable from an organizational point of view because,
such behaviour is thought to increase available resources and decrease the need
for more formal and costly mechanisms of control (Organ, 1988; Podsakoff, &
Mackenzie, 1997). It is seen as voluntary behaviour outside one’s official job
duties that positively affect the organization or its members (Borman &
Motowidlo, 1993; Organ, 1988).
Role can be defined as the expected
pattern of behaviour attached to a position with an organization (Ilgen,
Hollenbeck & Crampton, 1992). The expectations
encoded within a role specify a wide variety of requirements. Examples includes
what task role holders should perform, how they should interact with others,
how they should dress, how they should speak, what opinion and attitudes they should hold, what goals
they should work towards and what means they should employ to attain the goals
(Sarbin & Allen, 1968).
According to Aikhionbare (2016),
Nigeria Police is one of the cardinal Agencies of government. They are tasked
with the sole responsibility of protecting the lives and properties of citizens
of the country. The diverse roles of Nigeria police are as follows; crime
prevention, crime investigation, road traffic control, election protection
duties, controlling and quelling civil unrest, military duties, VIP protection
services etc.