CHAPTER
ONE
INTODUCTION
Background to the Study
University
libraries play critical roles in the fulfillment of the university’s
objectives, particularly with respect to teaching, learning and research, which
they are uniquely placed to enhance. The unique role of the university library
places it in such an important position that a university is said to be judged
by the quality of its library, that is, its library resources which are the
framework upon which library services are formed, regulated and used
(University Grant Committee, 1921; Agboola, 2000). Library resources are the means by which the
university library enhances the university’s core functions of learning,
teaching and research and are therefore extremely important to the effective
provision of library services. Library resources are the framework for use and
regulation of library services. In fact, without library resources it would be
very difficult if not impossible for any library to provide library services at
all. Library resources include information resources, infrastructural
resources, financial resources and different categories of human resources, all
of which are indispensable to the effective provision of library services in a
university. This underscores the imperative for effective provision of library
resources in every university, a task which enables the university library
deliver effective services to its users. The provision of library resources is
thus a primary responsibility of university libraries.
Information
resources are the different formats of recorded knowledge, including books and
journals in hard and soft copies, which libraries select, acquire, organize and
then make available to their users. As repositories of knowledge, university
libraries hold rich collections of books, journals and other varieties of
information resources in both print and electronic forms, as well as maps,
manuscripts, pictures, incunabula and real objects. These varieties of
information resources in the library constitute the framework by which the
students, lecturers and other users of the university library interact with
writers, artists and other types of authors in different fields in furtherance
of their teaching- learning activities. Provision of information resources
makes possible in-house reading as well as lending for use away from the
confines of the library building. In addition, the university library selects
and subscribes to key databases, a task beyond the competence and economic
scope of individual users. It makes them available, providing appropriate
guidance as to their usage. Moreover, through linkages with other libraries
near and far, the university library engages in cooperative acquisition of
vital information resources, thus saving cost and enhancing its financial
ability to purchase more with the funds available.
Infrastructural
resources constitute another major type of library resources which contributes
to the framework upon which the university library renders services to its
users. Infrastructural resources include library buildings and different types
of library equipment all of which are critical to effective service delivery in
a university library. The essence of library buildings lies in the fact that
they provide different spaces required for different specific purposes
pertinent to the functionality of the library. In actuality, library buildings
provide spaces for offices, work rooms, shelving, exhibition, lending, storage
and toilets. Another type of infrastructural resources consists of different
types of library equipment such as library shelves for display and storage of
books and journals, reading tables and chairs, and computer hardware for
offices and library use. Furthermore, other library equipment include
photocopying machines for reproduction of texts, bindery equipment with which
documents downloaded, photocopied or torn are bound for convenient storage and
longer usage; laminating machines with which various hard copies of documents
are laminated and thereby preserved, and standby electric generators that
provide alternative sources of electric power supply to the library to enhance
steady availability of electricity.
Financial
resources or simply funding are another critical type of library resources
without which it is unimaginable how a library would survive. Funds enable the
library to acquire books and journals, provide and maintain buildings and other
types of infrastructure, hire and train staff and also do many other things
that enhance the library’s goals. This underscores the importance of financial
resources to the effective provision of library resources through which the
university library renders effective services. Without financial resources, therefore,
many if not all of the library’s plans and programmes cannot be implemented.
Human
resources form the fourth major component of library resources. Human
resources, or simply the staff, is so invaluable in a university library that
without it all the other library resources cannot be combined optimally for the
library to attain its goals. To fulfill their role, university libraries need
to ensure that the library personnel, carefully trained for their functions and
guided by the university’s programmes, select varieties of information resources
from the vast array of sources in the world. These librarians’ duties also
extend to acquiring and organizing the materials selected to ensure that every
information resource in stock, as well as the records relating to it, is
properly placed in a systematic location so that the university’s students,
lecturers and other staff can find and use it quickly and conveniently, when
needed. Moreover, the library personnel preserve the information resources
through various ways, such as binding and proper storage. This, coupled with
the provision of adequate spaces for consultation of the information resources
and adequate security measures adopted to reduce harmful behaviours, like theft
and mutilation of information resources, helps to increase the life- spans of
the information resources and access to them by larger numbers of users.
Current
library resource provisions in Nigerian universities reveal inadequacies
concerning all types of library resources. Book and journal collections in both
print and electronic versions are small, and worn out and reading spaces are
congested with students endlessly scrambling for information resources
scattered on the shelves and reading tables with few library staff to give the
users attention. Other inadequacies observed include delays in completion and
maintenance of library infrastructural resources and shortage of library staff
(Ejiko, 1980; Bozimo, 1993; Raseroka, 1999; Agboola, 2000; Choudhury, 2003;
Sani and Tiamiyu, 2005; Ogunsola and Okusoga, 2006; Akintunde, 2006; and
Sharma, 2009).
The university
libraries’ collections are dominated by imported information resources,
especially from Europe, to the detriment of locally produced information
resources (Ejiko, 1980). The foreign- sourced information materials cost much
more to acquire due to the high exchange rate involved. An overwhelming
majority of academics in Nigerian universities have urgent need for library
materials which are not immediately available and academics find library
materials unsuitable for research and much more unsuitable for teaching
(Bozimo, 1993). Library buildings are the most heavily used facilities in any
university campus without corresponding plans by the universities for libraries
to accommodate increases in student intakes, and approval for increased reading
space takes long to secure; equipping the library is usually shelved by
university hierarchy in budgetary planning while rising cost deepens problems
of obtaining university commitment to sustained funding of library materials
(Raseroka, 1999). Of concern also is the fact that university library buildings
are constructed without regard to standard (Ifidon, 1999). All these problems prompted Agboola (2000) to
conclude, and rightly also, that there is a depressing absence of growth,
especially in qualitative terms concerning funding, stock, physical facilities
and ICT application. Consequently, there is the need to determine the influence
behind this situation so as to find ways of improving it, thus helping the
university libraries to assume their rightful place in enhancing the core
functions of their universities.
The
implication of all the foregoing is that university libraries need to converge
their resources properly such that the resources can interact optimally with
themselves, thereby generating the desired services for users. The university
libraries achieve this through their management which, according to Griffins
(1999), is one critical factor influencing the provision of resources in
university libraries. As defined by Drucker (2001), management is the guidance,
leadership and direction of a group’s efforts towards organizational objectives.
Management functions exercised through a set of activities are directed at the
organization’s human, information, financial and physical resources with the
aim of attaining the organization’s goals efficiently and effectively.
Management consists of various activities, elements or functions which include
planning, organization, staffing, evaluation and control. Others are
coordination and motivation, directing and leading, and communication (Connor
1978; Koontz and O’ Donnell, 2002; and Ifidon and Ifidon, 2007). These
functions, activities, elements or variables of management are known as managerial
variables, which are the elements by which management works. Without managerial
variables management would be stale and ineffective because managerial
variables represent the media for management operations; management works
through them. Managerial variables include planning, organization, evaluation,
control and coordination. The others include directing, motivation, leadership
and supervision.
Planning is a process of setting goals for the
university library. It also involves the determination of the activities to be
performed within a specified period and the funding implications of each. In
the view of Hartzell (2006), planning is a systematic effort to organize the
future performance of human beings, money or goods and services within some
identified constraints of time span. Planning has some parts that constitute it
and there are five major component parts: formulation of vision; mission
statements; goals and objectives; environmental scanning strategy, and policy
statements (Aina, 2004).
Once
the planning function is completed the next major function is organization
which follows logically from it and involves the provision of the activities
that have to be performed towards achieving the goals and objectives
articulated in the plan. In libraries, the activities are usually arranged into
departments or units that complement one another by their operation, while the
structures of authority, power, accountability and responsibility within the
library are clearly defined. This enables each staff to know his schedules of
duty, superiors, colleagues and subordinates and how to relate to each one in
the performance of his duties; in terms of collaboration, reporting or
supervision. Evaluation, another element of management, operationally means
appraisal or assessment of functions or outputs, based on the library’s goals.
Evaluation is aimed at assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of a library
in reaching its goals and objectives. Hartzell (2006) identified three major
types of evaluation: outcome (impact); process (performance), and input
(administrative). Evaluation helps to determine the quality of outputs, extent
of attainment of set goals and any factors hampering performance.
The
control function, which logically results from evaluation, is intricately
linked with it, and includes all the activities the manager does to ensure that
actual outputs conform to planned results. This enhances the attainment of set
goals and objectives in conformity with the library’s vision. Control is the
ultimate reason for carrying out an evaluation and constitutes a reliable way
of ensuring the organization is continuously positioned for optimal performance
in the light of its established goals (Donnelly, Gibson and Ivancevich,
1987).
It
is very important to harmonise the different departments and functions of the
library if the entire library must progress smoothly toward its goals of
unleashing its resources for effective provision of services to the library
users. This important activity is achieved by means of coordination, which is a
management function that is closely linked to the managerial variable of organization.
Coordination represents the process of integrating all the parts and functions
of an organization in order to enhance smooth and mutual operation toward the
attainment of organizational goals. (Hartzell, 2006). The different departments
of a university library like acquisition, cataloguing, circulation and bindery,
which make up the university library, perform different but interrelated functions
none of which, alone, is sufficient to enable the organization achieve its set
goals. The creation of departments helps to enhance specialisation and
organized functioning for the common good of all the parts.
Another important management function is leadership,
which is the function that enables the manager to persuade others to pursue the
objectives of the organization enthusiastically. The leader triggers motivation
in the staff and inspires them to release their potentials as they apply
themselves to their tasks which he guides towards the organization’s goals.
Leadership is a process by which a person exerts influence over other persons.
Such influence, according to French and Raven (1967) as quoted by Donnelly,
Gibson and Ivancevich, (1987), derives from five bases of power, namely, coercive
power (power based upon fear); reward power (positive rewards for subordinates);
legitimate power (power derived from the position of the supervisor); expert
power (power of one with an expertise), and referent power (power resulting
from admiration of the supervisor). One way of providing leadership is through
supervision which concerns overseeing the staff to ensure that each of the
members is carrying out the task assigned to him properly. Supervision involves
direct observation of the situation on ground: number and quality of staff,
staff performance, providing encouragement, sanctions, and appropriate
recommendations to higher authorities (Ogunsaju, 1983).
Direction
is yet another management function worthy of mention. It is the totality of
actions of managers relating to instructions to subordinates in the methods and
procedures and to the supervision of the work of subordinates to ensure that it
is being performed properly. Although directing is generally associated with
line supervisors, every manager undertakes it to some degree as he rises up
within the organizational hierarchy, assuming other management functions. To be
effective, a directive must be not only consistent with the overall goals of
the organization but also reasonable and clear.
Clarity
of directives relates to the need for effective communication in the work
place. Communication is a flow of information that people use to pass messages
from one person to another. The crucial place of communication lies in the fact
that it is the basis of collaborative action which is the essence of organizational
performance where different departments and officials have to perform different
but interdependent tasks. When every staff has clear understanding of the
expectations of his office, and other relevant information relating to the organization,
this reduces ambiguity and the tendency to spread rumour. Proper communication
enhances the quality of supervision in the university library because it
promotes release of clear instructions and adequate flow of information up and
down the hierarchy (Tyons and York, 1996).The present study is focused on the
managerial variables of planning, organization and evaluation. This choice was
guided by the realization that the three management functions are the core
elements of management given the fact that each of the other functions like
staffing, coordinating and control is intricately linked to planning, organization
or evaluation (Connor, 1978).
Statement of the Problem
Despite
the importance of library resources to the provision of effective library
services in universities, it is observed that their quality and quantity leave
much to be desired. The collections of books and journals are small, as
compared to the teeming number of users; many of the volumes are obsolete and
dilapidated due to long pressure of use. The situation is exacerbated by inadequacies
associated with library buildings and equipment, and shortage of staff. This negates
the universities’ mandate on teaching, learning and research, among others.