ABSTRACT
The
study focuses on the development of government bond market in Nigeria. It
explores the history, structure, performance and key issues related to the
development of bond market with the broader context of domestic, regional and
global bond market development. The Nigeria government bond market provides
valuable lessons for other emerging market economies also seeking to build bond
market. The sophistication of the local bond market is not enough to make it
appealing to foreign borrowers. Market development demands an enabling market
infrastructure and a background of macro-economic stability, diversified market
participants, an appropriate regulatory and supervision environment.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
Title
Page……………………………………………………………………………………i
Certification………………………………………………………………………………….ii
Approval
Page………………………………………………………………………………iii
Dedication…………………………………………………………………………………..iv
Acknowledgement……………………………………………………………………..v
Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………..vi
Table Of Contents………………………………………………………………..vii-x
List
of Tables…………………………………………………………………………………xi
List
of Figures………………………………………………………………………………xii
CHAPTER
ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background of Study………………………………………………………1-6
1.2. Objective of the
Study……………………………………………………………..6-7
1.3. Scope of the Study…………………………………………………………..7
1.4. Limitations of the Study…………………………………………………….7
1.5. Significance of the Study…………………………………………..7-8
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE
REVIEW
2.1. Introduction………………………………………………………………10
2.2. The Development of Bond Markets in Emerging Markets………….10
2.2.1. Introduction…………………………………………………………10
2.2.2. Rationale for Developing a Domestic Bond Market……..11
2.2.2.1.Introduction ………………………………………11
2.2.2.2.An Alternative Source of Domestic Debt Finance……….11-12
2.2.2.3.Lower Cost of Capital…………………………………12-13
2.2.2.4.Broadening of Capital Markets………………………..13
2.2.2.5.Efficient Pricing of Credit Risks…………………..13-14
2.2.2.6.Promotion of Financial Stability……………………14-15
2.2.3. Critical Success Factors…………………………………………………15
2.2.3.1.Introduction…………………………………………….15-17
2.2.3.2.The Political Situation…………………………………………..17
2.2.3.3.The Macro Economic Situation………………………..17-18
2.2.3.4.Supervision and Regulation…………………………………………18-20
2.2.4. Other Bonds Markets……………………………………………20
2.2.4.1.Introduction…………………………………………20-21
2.2.4.2.Asia…………………………………………………………………………….21-22
2.2.4.3.Europe………………………………………………………………………….22-24
2.2.4.4.The United States……………………………………………………24-26
2.2.4.5.African Bond Markets………………………………………..26
2.3. Summary…………………………………………………………………………..26
CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
3.1. Research
Design………………………………………………………………….29
3.2. Nature and Sources of Data………………………29
3.3. Population and Sample Size…………………………….29-30
3.4. Techniques for Analysis………………………………………30
CHAPTER FOUR: DATA
PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
4.1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………..32
4.2. Size and Performance of the Nigeria Bond Market…33-37
4.3. Listing……………………………………………………………………………38
4.4. Enabling Legislation………………………………………………38-39
4.5. Basic Framework to Analyze and Evaluate the Nigeria Bond Market………39-40
4.5.1. Nigeria Bond Market Analysis and Interpretation…41
4.5.2. Stable Macro Economic Policies…………………………………….41-43
4.5.3. Stable Political Environment………………………………………43
4.5.4. Robust Legal Environment ………..43
4.5.5. Market Infrastructure……………………………………..43-44
4.5.6. Diversified Market Participants……………………44
4.5.6.1.Issuers…………………………………………………………………………..45
4.5.6.2.Investors…………………………………………………………………….45-47
4.6. Conclusion………………………………………………………………………47
CHAPTER FIVE:
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1. Summary of
Conclusions…………………………………………………..49-50
5.2. Lessons and Challenges for the Rest of Africa……51-52
5.3. Recommendations……………………………………………………………..52
Bibliography………………………………………………………………………..53-55
LIST OF TABLES
Table
1.1: Transformation of the Domestic
Debt Stock by Instruments – Dec.31 2002
Compared to Dec.2009.
Table
1.2: Progression of the Tenor
Elongation.
Table
2.1: Transformation of the Domestic
Debt Stock Outstanding by Holder Type – Dec. 31, Compared to Dec. 31, 2009.
Table
2.2: Domestic Debt Growth Trends
from 2004-2009.
Table
2.3: FGN Bond Primary Market Issuance
2003-2009.
Table
2.3.1: Domestic Debt Issuance by
Tenor, 2009.
Table
3.1: FGN Bonds Secondary Market
Trades (OTC), 2006-2009.
LIST OF FIGURES
Fig.
1: Framework for Assessing Municipal Bond
Development (Leigland Framework).
Fig.
2: Framework for Assessing the Nigeria
Bond Market’s Success.
Fig.
3: Analysis of the 6th FGN
Bonds 2009 Allotment.
CHAPTER
ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF STUDY
The
current administration’s commitment to rebuilding Nigeria’s dilapidated infrastructure
as a catalyst for economic development has brought to the fore the need for a
functional bond market given the developmental needs of the economy. The recent
period of economy growth witnessed in Nigeria can only be sustained with
continuous investment in infrastructure and the expansion of industrial output.
The dearth of adequate financing has been identified as one key factor
inhabiting this much needed investment in critical infrastructure such as down
and mid stream petroleum distribution, telecommunication and transportation.
Additionally, substantial long term financing would be required to rejuvenate
Nigeria ailing power sector, it comatose refineries and the provision of
socio-economic development in education and healthcare. Moreover, recent effort
by the FGN to diversify the economic and make it more market driven means that
funds would also be needed to expand existing facilities to meet the increased
demand expected of a more efficient economy over the long term.
The
Bond Market remains a fundamental financial market as risk pricing and
investment valuation models rely on its data. While a functional domestic bond
market is necessary for capital investment, monetary authorities also use bonds
to define the yield curve and to ensure stability of short-term rates. An
active sovereign prevents the economy from overheating as it allows large
temporary overflows from the money market. The Bond Market therefore plays such
a vital role in ensuring the health of the economy that the monetary authorities
must be concerned with its structure and operation.
Internationally
best-practice stipulates the existence of a public debt managing agency. Until
2000, no such agency existed in Nigeria. Whilst the Federal Debt Management
Office (DMO) may have eventually been instituted, debt relief provided a
critical spur, and ensured it was provided with sufficient resources to achieve
the country’s goal of debt relief. This meant that a strong, capable debt
management agency was created more quickly, and with greater public support,
than it otherwise would have been.
Nigerian
Bond market is principally regulated by the ISA and the Rules and Regulations
of the Nigerian Security and Exchange Commission (SEC). Although the Nigerian
Sovereign Bonds have been in existence since the 1970s, but was said to be
inactive. Government issued paper was very
short-term and limited in scale. Treasury bills had maturities of 91 days and
below and this created inconsistencies and irregularities in the federal
government’s borrowing costs. The DMO, in a bid to restructure the Federal
Government of Nigeria’s deficit funding from shorter to longer tenured
borrowing instruments, improve and lengthen the yield curve in the domestic
money markets, and to encourage long-term savings, introduced the sale of
Federal Government of Nigeria bonds in October 2003, with the launching of four
Federal Government bonds of maturities ranging from three years to ten years.
The bonds were sold to investors through all licensed banks and discount houses
in the country. However, most of the investors adopted a “hold to maturity”
approach and therefore little or no secondary trades were carried out.
The
DMO extensively restructured Nigeria’s domestic debt portfolio. In 2005, it
commenced a textbook bond market development programme. This began with the
initial issuance of 2 and 3 year bonds for which there was appetite, and
gradually and predictably increased to issues of 5, 7, 10 and now 20 year
bonds. However, the regular monthly issuance of the federal government bonds of
increasing tenor generates a sovereign yield curve which serves as a benchmark
for pricing other securities, including corporate bonds. This is a very
powerful strategy to support growth by generating long term funding sources for
government financed development projects such as infrastructure, but more
importantly, will help to realize the potential of Nigeria’s vibrant private
sector to create wealth and jobs by opening this source of domestic funding.
In December 2004, the Nigerian domestic
debt stock had an outstanding amount of N1, 370.32 billion, compared to the
N1,329.72 billion as at December 2003. This figure had an increase of N40.63
billion or 3.1 percent over the previous year’s figure. This however, was the
lowest annual growth in the domestic debt stock for eight years(DMO 2009).
This increase of N40.63 billion in
the domestic debt stock was made up of new issues of Treasury Bills valued at
N46.52 billion, which was partly offset by repayments of Treasury Bonds and FGN
Development Stocks valued at N5.67 billion and N0.22 billion respectively.
As
at the previous year (2003), the Treasury Bills remained the dominant
instrument, accounting for N871.57 billion or 64 percent of the total domestic
debt stock. The balance of the total domestic debt stock was made up of
Treasury bond (N424.94 billion or 31 percent), Federal Republic of Nigeria
Government Development Stock (N1.25 billion or 0.1 percent) and the first FGN
Bonds (N72.56 billion or 5.3 percent).
In the year 2004, the DMO made plans
to build on the success of the first FGN Bonds floatation that were first
issued in 2003. The DMO embarked on the arrangements to commence the issuance
of bonds on a regular basis in small tranches that market could accommodate.
The DMO commenced the smoothening
and restructuring of the Treasury Bills in 2004. The restructuring entailed
extending the maturities of the existing Treasury Bills by issuing tenors of 6,
12, 24, and 36 months, to refinance part of the existing 91-day Treasury Bills.
The
2005 bonds issuance programme which had a floatation of N140 billion over the
period July to December 2005, had the objectives of restructuring the existing
stick of Nigerian Treasury Bills into longer-tenured bonds, and to help sustain
the momentum of reviving, deepening and developing the Nigerian capital market
(DMO, 2005).
The
debt deal in 2005 not only removed a significant financial burden from the
government, allowing it to spend its resources on public service delivery and
social sectors, but it enabled the DMO to refocus its energy on the core
business of public debt management – “establishing and executing a strategy to
manage the government’s debt in order to raise the required amount of funding,
pursue its cost and risk objectives, and to meet any other public debt
management goals the government may have set, such as developing and
maintaining an efficient and liquid market for government securities” (IMF and
World Bank, 2002).
The
next landmark in the development of the bond market occurred in August 2006,
when a primary dealership/market maker network was established. The Primary
Dealers/Market Markers (PDMMs) are the only institutions authorized to deal
directly with the DMO in bond auctions. The establishment of this system was to
facilitate the emergence of a liquid and vibrant secondary market for
government securities, in line with global best practices (DMO 2006).
Prior
to the establishment of the of the system, DMO requested for expressions of
interest (EOI) to the PDMMs in the FGN Bonds from financial institutions, of
which a total of thirty-two (32) EOIs were received (DMO 2006).
The purpose of the PDMM system is in
two-fold:
- To ensure the total take up at primary
auctions of government bonds.
- To provide liquidity in the secondary
bond market.
Apart from underwriting every bond
issue, the PDMMs, are also required to make two-way price quotes on the bonds
to their customers and other PDMMs in all market conditions upon demand. This
means there has been viable and vibrant secondary market trading in FGN bonds
issued by the DMO since August 2006.
The strategy for the development of
Nigeria’s bond market from 2008-2012 is organized on a medium term basis with
an annual securities issuance work plan. In developing this work plan, the
Federal Government conducts wide consultations with market participants through
regular monthly meetings held with Primary Dealer Market Makers (PDMMs),
usually before each FGN Bond auctions. (DMO, 2008).
Bond issuance in 2008-2012 will continue
to aim at developing the bond market and creating a benchmark for the issuance
of other instruments. This will be achieved through the issuance of
long-tenured instruments. It also aim at
providing low cost funding for the FGN, subject to the control of risks within
acceptable limits, and developing the market for long-term debt instruments,
thereby creating a benchmark yield curve for other financial instrument in
Nigeria.
The Work Plan for the bond issuance
programme in 2008-2012 will include advertisement of Offer Circulars, conduct
of auctions, post allotment activities and development of indicators for
domestic debt sustainability.
The
2008-2012 Bond Issuance will include the following features:
- Following the continued sophistication
of the appetite of the market, a variety of instruments such as floating rate
and index-linked securities may be introduced;
- With growing sophistication and capacity
in the market and also in order to optimally allocate government resources, the
multiple pricing auction system may be introduced;
- The FGN Bonds auctions, which are
presently conducted monthly, may be made more frequent as demand for the bonds
continues to soar, particularly with limitations on re-openings; and
- The submission of bids will be done on
the day and within a specified timeline or duration while settlement takes
place on T+2.
- The restructuring of short-term debt
instruments to long-term will continue until the ratio of 25:75 short-term to
long-term debt ratio is achieved. (DMO, 2008).
The
curve of tenors on debt instruments has increased sharply and impressively in
the six years since the launch of the Access Bank government bond index. Today,
the government has issued bonds with a 20 year tenor. This reflects the growing
confidence in the market’s capacity to absorb Government bonds and in the
sophistication of the instrument to serve as a key conduit for state funding.
While investors’ search for a stable asset class has proved a strong catalyst
for the market’s expansion, investors are attracted to government bonds for
some technical reasons, such as their tax exemption status.
The corporate bond market is also developing, and this may be attributable to the need for inexpensive long-term debt capital by companies coupled with investors’ apathy to equity investments, following the impact of the global economic recession on the values of stocks. Companies including Guaranty Trust Bank Plc, UACN property Development Company Plc, United Bank for Africa Plc and Flour Mills of Nigeria Plc have successfully issued bonds in the Nigeria capital market while a number of other corporate bond application are before the Nigerian SEC.