ABSTRACT
The main objective of this were (1)
to identify how government regulations help in the growth of small-scale
industries in Nigeria; (2) To examine the impact the impact of the government
regulations in the growth of the small-scale industries (3) To make
recommendations on any lapses in government regulations for the growth of
small-scale industries in the country and (4) To fill a research gap on the
merit and demerit of government regulations in the growth of the small-scale
industries in the country. To enable the research to make his findings, it was
hypothesized that (1) the greater the number of small-scale industries in
Nigeria, the greater their role in rural transformation (development); (2) The
positive impact of government regulations of small-scale industries would be
possible when the have access to loanable funds for Expansion, and (3) the
greater the inadence of bureaucratic corruptive, the higher the failure of the
small-scale industries’ access to loanable funds for development. In the
methodology, the researcher utilized samples, used respondents from Plateau,
Nasarawa, Abuja, Benue for our survey.
The chi-square was used for data analysis, while the popular
questionnaire of Yes-No type were used to measure the response in the
questionnaire.
The findings were that:
- Government regulations have both
negative and positive impaction the growth of small-scale enterprises in
Nigeria.
- Bribery and corruption practices by
bankers and government officials negate the ideas of granting loans to the
small-scale industries for development of our communities.
- Small-scale entrepreneurs should have
access to investment capital in order to get Nigeria economy out of the woods.
- There should be an equity investment
scheme that should require each bank in the country to set aside 10% of its
profit before tax annually to make equity investment in small-scale industries.
- Banks should be involved in the running
of small-scale industries to ensure judicious utilization of funds disbursed to
small-scale industries.
- The peasants must be assisted through
loan and expert advice in the need to invest in small-scale industries for
rural development.
- The federal and state governments should
provide infrastructure and social services in order to give some logistic
support for the growth of small scale industries.
- Major companies that are beneficiaries
of major contract in Nigeria should be encourage by government to give priority
to SMEs with relevant competence when giving our sub-contract.
- Too operate a business in Nigeria as of
now, you need to purchase your own power generator, sunk your own borehole for
water and other necessary infrastructural facilities. Government should improve the performance of
these infrastructure to reduce the high cost of doing business and thus ensure
the survival of SMEs.
- The number of government approving
agencies should be streamlined while unstable exchange rates, high interest
rates and un-cooperative attitude of government official should be addressed.
TABLE OF CONTENT
Title Page
Certification Page
Dedication
Acknowledgement
Abstract
Table of contents
List of Abbreviations
List
of Tables
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
of the study
1.2 Statement
of the problem
1.3 Objectives
of the Research
1.4 Research
Hypothesis
1.5 Significance
of the research
1.6 Limitations
of the research
References
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Legal
Environment of Business in Nigeria
2.2 Political
Environment in Nigeria and Business growth
2.3 Government
regulatory Agencies and the Growth of Business
2.4 International
Environment and the Growth of SSIs in Nigeria.
2.5 The
classification of Business Enterprises in Nigeria and the SSIs.
2.6 Small-Scale
Industry and Ambiguous concept.
2.7 Re-organization of Development Finance
Institutions and the Funding of SSIs in Nigeria
2.8 Commercial
Banks and Assistance to SSIs in Nigeria
2.9 Measures by Government to enhance the
access of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises to Institutional Credit.
2.10 Yar’Adua’s
Administration and the funding of SMES in Nigeria
2.11 Problems
of SME operators and Adequate Collateral Securities
2.12 Government
and the Expansion of Incentives to SME
2.13 The UNPP Assistance in SME Development in
Nigeria (Programme Achievements).
2.14 UNPP
Assistance to Nigerian SMEs and their capacity Building
2.15 UNPP Assisted Proigramme in Nigeria and the
SME’s operational, Financial, and Management Issues.
2.16 Impact of UNDP Assisted programmes in
Nigeria on the SMES
2.17 Characteristics of small-scale Business in
Nigeria
2.18 Problems of Small-Scale Business
2.19 Delegation of Authority in SSIs
2.20 The Role of SSIs in the Nigerian Economy
2.21 Nigeria’s Indigenization Policy and the
Growth of SSIs in the country
2.22 Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) and
the growth of SSIs in Nigeria.
2.23 Privatization, Commercialization and their
impact on the Growth of SSIs in Nigeria.
References
CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Scope of the study
3.2 The Target population
3.3 The sample size
3.4 Research Design
3.5 Sampling method
3.6 Techniques for Data Analysis
3.7 Operational Definition of Terms
References
CHAPTER FOUR: DATA ANALYSIS
4.1 Government
policy
4.2 Testing
of Hypothesis
References
CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Conclusion
5.2 Recommendations
References
Appendix
LIST OF ABBREVIATION
BI Bank of Industries
CBN Central
Bank of Nigeria
DFI Development
Fund Institutions
FEAP Family
Economic Advancement Programme
GATT General Agreements on Tariffs and Tr
GCCC Government Cash Counter-part
Contribution
G7 Group of Seven
Most Economically Development Country
ILO International
Labour Organisation
IMF International
Monetary Fund
NACB Nigeria
Agricultural Credit Bank
NASSI National
Association of Small Scale Industry
NBCI Nigeria
Bank for Commerce and Industry
NCGS National Credit Guarantee Scheme
NERFUND National Economic Reconstruction Fund
NIDB Nigerian
Industrial Development Bank
NGOS Non-governmental Organisations
NSE Nigeria
Stock Exchange
NPDF Nigeria
Project Development Facility
OPS Organized
Private Sector
PSO Private
Sector Organisation
SAP Structural
Adjustment Programme
SSPP SAP
Standard Policy Package
SEMS Stock Exchange Management Systems
Sopt
SME Small
and Medium Enterprises
SMEDFUND Small and Medium
Enterprise Development
SON Standard
Organization of Nigeria
TG Trade
Groups
UAC United
African Company
UNDP United Nations Development Programme
USD United
States Dollar
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Nigeria is a mixed economy with a
positive leaning towards a free-market economic system. The provisions of the
Nigerian constitution (1999) summarize the objectives of this economic system,
namely that:
- The
state shall control the national economic in such a manner as the secure the
maximum welfare, freedom and happiness of every citizen on the basis of social
justice and equality of status and opportunity;
- The
state shall manage the major sectors of the economy (defense, currency,
banking, import, export, military, aviation, railways, active part in other
resources, agriculture, industrial development, etc)
- The
state shall, without prejudice to the right of any person to participate in
areas within the major sector of the economy project the right of every citizen
to engage in any economic activities outside the major sectors of the economy.
- The
state shall direct policy towards ensuring:
- The
promotion of a planned and balanced economic development;
- That
the material resources of the community are harnessed and distributed as best
as possible to serve the common good;
- That
the economic system is not operated in such a manner as to permit the
concentration of wealth or means of production and exchange in the hands of few
individuals or of a group; and,
- That
suitable and adequate shelter, suitable and adequate food, reasonable national
minimum living wage, old age care and pensions, and unemployment and sick
benefits are provided for all citizens.
It can be seen that the above
national economic objective provide a marriage between the two principal economic
systems- the market economy and the command economy. It provides checks and
balances to ensure that the abuses and disadvantages of either system are minimized
or completely eliminated. The question that remain however, is a statement of
how for these laudable economic objectives have been achieve in Nigeria.
It can be stated categorically that
the state, through legislation, has been in full control national economy and
that individual citizens have been free to engage in private enterprises, but
the combination have not been such that has granted maximum welfare, and
happiness, for the majority of people nor has to provided suitable, and
reasonable food, clothing or shelter for all citizens. There has been
concentration of wealth and means of production in the hands of few individuals
so that the majority of people are writing in the pangs of abject poverty,
hunger, ignorance, disease and death (A.U Inegbenebor and Essosa Bob Osaze
(199:13-14).
The reasons for this colossal failure
in realizing the promises of the economic objectives are to be found more in
the political than in the economic arena. Political instability military
interregnum, tribal politics and selfishness of leaders, general misrule, among
many other political ills, have combined to thwart the notable constitutional
economic objectives. Governments have been run in such a way as to create
massive economic inequalities and disaffection among the populace. The economy
has witnessed excessive money supply as the government mint rolled out the
fifty, hundred, two hundred and five hundred naira currency notes in the
billions. Combined with the very high tastes of the few rich for foreign
ensured a very how and continuously dwindling naira value.
Nigerian business have been the worse
for all these. An unstable political system has left the business scene highly
assess have had to fold up or drastically reduce capacity utilization. Lacking
of continuity and stability from all business sectors, economic growth has
steadily been in the decline, especially when measured in real terms.
Another aspect of the setting of this
research is the development of business (history) in Nigeria. Every human
society develops some means of producing and distributing the goods and
services that it needs. The history of business in Nigeria can be conveniently
divided into pre-colonial, colonial and post colonial periods. In the
pre-colonial era, several complex civilizations had developed in the forest
zone of the west coast of Africa and the Sudan. The civilizations, especially
Ghana, Songhai, Mali, Kanem-Bornu, Ife, Oyo and Benin kingdoms built their
economic on conquest, agriculture, craft industries and trading between Sudan
and North Africa, the trans-Saharan trade in gold, Ivory, Kolanuts, salt,
cloths and slaves flourished for several centuries. Other trade routes also
developed along major rivers such as the Chad Basin area, Senegal, Niger, and
Volta Rivers as well the Niger-Delta (pr the oil Rivers protectorate).
Along the trade routes, major
commercial centres such as Timbuktu quickly developed. Market squares became
characteristics features of the major cities of the kingdoms. In these
commercial centres, local merchants emerged as intermediaries between producers
in the interior and buyers at the terminus of the trade routes. These merchants
performed the typical functions of middlemen including control of the trade,
Identification and selection, machinery sourcing conduct of market studies and
preparation of feasibility studies.
Again, the central role which
government ascribed to small-scale industrial activities in its strategy for
economic restructuring and growth informed its decision to utilize United
Nations Development Programme’s (UNDP) technical assistance to supplement key
components of the national programme during the 4th country
programme 1992-1996. UNDP support was targeted at the five component areas
considered essential for an enterprise to perform effectively. It assisted in
improving the regulatory framework for policy, planning and institutional
development to ensure that the new private sector led growth strategy with the
active participation of small-scale industries/industrialists is properly
articulated and implemented government’s efforts at industrial infrastructure
facilities development.
However, the economic policy
Blueprint released by the Obasanjo administration to guide economic reinvention
and reengineering for the period 199-2003 apportions high priority to
agriculture, manufacturing, small/medium enterprises and the informal sectors
as key instruments for achieving the targeted goals enumerated in the policy
(Business Time, July 19,- 15, 2001, P.6).
There is little doubt that it has
been fully realized and acknowledged; that an energized and fully functional
small-scale industrial scale-sector has the potential of transforming the
industrial base of the country as well serve as the propellant for the much
needed economic rejuvenation.
The contribution of SMEs to the
industrialization process is still generally low in Nigeria compared to
countries with similar backgrounds in South East Asia Latin America. Although
efforts have been made by many successive governments, right from independence
to promote SMEs in the industrialization process, the development of the
sub-sector has been constrained by a number of factors, both internal and
external.
According to Chief Kola Jamodu, the
minister of industry these factors include:
- Unstable
macro-economic environment;
- Inconsistent
character of policy measures
- Poor
implementation and coordination of efforts on SMEs;
- Absence
of suitable institutional mechanism;
- Poor
Infrastructural facilities; i.e. roads/railway systems, water supply
electricity telecommunications, etc and
- Lack
of effective financial support systems (Ibid).
In addition to the fore-going, the SMEs in Nigeria was also handicapped by their peculiar internal characteristics, which manifest in the following forms of state-owned enterprises was very poor. The enterprises became a major drain on government revenues. With this background and the adoption of the structural Adjustment programme in 1986, government decided to privatize or commercialize many of its business ventures.
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM