TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
Title Page i
Certification ii
Dedication iii
Acknowledgement iv
Table of Contents v
List of Tables vii
List of Appendices viii
Abstract ix
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION 1
Statement of Problem 12
Purpose of Study 12
Operational Definition of Terms 13
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW 15
Theoretical Review 15
Family Systems Theory 15
Family Development Theory 19
Self-Determination Theory 20
Cognitive Evaluation Theory 23
Social Exchange Theory 26
Gender Roles, Equity Theory 30
Theories of Social Construction of Gender 34
Attachment Theory and Psychology of Religion 38
Empirical Review 42
Gender Role Orientation and Marital Satisfaction 42
Religiosity and Marital Satisfaction 47
Self- Determination and Marital Satisfaction 51
Summary of Literature Review 53
Hypotheses
55
CHAPTER THREE
METHOD 56
Participants 56
Instruments 56
Procedure 59
Design and Statistics 60
CHAPTER FOUR
RESULTS 61
Summary of Findings 64
CHAPTER FIVE
DISCUSSION
Implication of the Study 70
Limitations of the Study 71
Suggestions for Further Research 72
Summary and Conclusion 73
REFERENCES
APPENDICES
List of Tables
Table 1 Table of Correlations for the study
variables.
Table 2 Table of Regression coefficients for marital satisfaction from gender role orientation, religiosity, and self-determination.
List of Appendices
Appendix A: Bem Sex role Inventory Short Form- (BSRI-SF)
Appendix B: Basic Need Satisfaction in General Scale (BNSGS)
Appendix
C: Index
of Marital Satisfaction IMS
(IMS)
Appendix D:Religious Commitment Inventory-10 (RCI)
Appendix E: Computer printouts showing SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) analysis result
ABSTRACT
This
study investigated gender role orientation, religiosity, and self-determination as predictors of marital
satisfaction among married couples. Participants were one hundred
and eighty seven (187) married couples, drawn
from three religions namely Christianity, Islam and African Traditional
Religion.
Theirages ranged from 21 years to 50 years, and were categorized.Cross
Sectional design was adopted.Four instruments were used for data collection; Bem Sex role
Inventory Short Form, Basic Need Satisfaction in General Scale,Index
of Marital Satisfaction and Religious
Commitment Inventory-10.Three hypotheses were tested. Hierarchical multipleregression was the main statistic used
for dataanalysis. Results of the regression analysisindicated that gender role orientation (p< .001), religiosity (p<.05), intrapersonal (p<.05), self-determination (p<.001),autonomy (p<.01), as well
as competence (p<.001) all were shown to be significant predictors of marital satisfaction
among couples. Interpersonal dimension of religiosity and relatedness
dimension of self-determination were not significant predictors of marital
satisfaction among couples. One nascent implication of thisfinding is that couples seeing themselves as one other than strictly
emphasizing on gender role will increase rate of marital satisfaction in our
society. Other
implicationswere also stated, limitations and suggestions for furtherstudies
were made.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
People get married with the expectation of happiness ever after, but it doesn’t always work out that way. There may be too many fights, too few good times and the sense that one and his/her spouse are growing farther apart rather than closer together.However, despite how good or sad marital life may look; understanding what professionals have discovered about marital satisfaction may help couples focus on how to improve their relationship.
Many
people believe that, after the initial joy of getting married, the spark
inevitably goes out of love and boredom sets in. Interestingly, researchers
found that sometimes stresses originating outside the marriage can seriously
affect the relationship, especially when spouses are less adept at
problem-solving. However, unhappiness
isn’t necessarily a result of boredom with each other or a sign that one’s relationship is
doomed, but rather may be in reaction to challenges outside the relationship that can
be dealt with and addressed.
Human
development entails transition and accomplishment of developmental tasks at
different stages. For example, the transition from adolescence to adulthood has
been noted to be of high importance (Arnett, 2004; Montgomery & Cote, 2003). For this, Arnett (2000, 2004)
conceptualized the transition from adolescence to adulthood as ‘emerging
adulthood’. Similarly, Arnett (2004) postulates that the age range for
attaining adulthood is approximately 18 to 25 years of age. Hence, section 29
(4) of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999) Constitution provides that legal
age at which individual attains maturity and accountability is 18 years. At
this point, social activities such as marriage, parenthood, occupational
advancement, and child rearing are some of the significant markers that buttress
maturity and adulthood. In Erikson’s sixth developmental stage intimacy versus
isolation, individuals are faced with the task of forming intimate relationship
with others. This relationship most times tends to be consummated into
marriage. When healthy friendship takes place, an intimate relationship with
another individual is formed, and intimacy will be achieved but if not the
result is isolation. In this case, the marital relationship is threatened. In view of the purpose that propel
people into marriage;Relationship Indicators Survey conducted byRelationships
Australia and Catholic University of American (2008)showed the following as reasons why people marry: “…For love,
companionship, procreation, security for children, make public commitment to
each other, legal status or for financial security, religious beliefs, response
to family pressures, desire for a special occasion” For our Nigerian society,
one adage that confirms her position on marital life opines that “a man without
a wife is like a vase without flowers”; while “a woman without a husband is
like a house without a roof”. May be this is probably why some men and women
rush into marriage as to be counted or seen as being responsible. But some
interesting questions that need to be answered include; are all marriages a bed
of roses? To what extent are the couples happy and satisfied?In reference to
these questions, Haidari, Zarei, and Sadeglifard (2013) maintained that one
important aspect of the family system is the satisfaction that couples
experience.Therefore, Ellis (1992)defined marital satisfaction as contentment,
satisfaction and pleasure experienced by couples and believes that ignoring the
other side’s interests and mind- set causes disappointment and frustration in
the marital relationship.