Abstract
This work is motivated by the apparent intractability of the ethnic problems in Nigeria. A cursory glace at the history of ethnicity reveals that as far back as early 1990s, some Nigerians had warns about the negative patriotic, progressive and other have inveighed against it and suggested solutions to it. Some of these solution have been tried in the past dispensation of democracy but to no avail. Further examination of the relevant literature indicates that a great deal of intellectual endeavour has been devoted to the ethnic phenomenon. The work identify among others that ethnicity have stand to militate against the democratic principles in Nigeria politics and governance. However, certain criticism suggested that the study could be strengthened of the theoretical perspective were anchored in some concrete situation in response to this I decided to male a concrete overview of the 1999 – 2011 democratic dispensation.
TABLE OF CONTENT
Title
page
Approval
page ii
Dedication
iii
Acknowledgement
iv
Abstract
v
Table
of content vi
CHAPTER ONE
1.0. Introduction 1
1.1. Background of study 1
1.2. Statement of the problem 3
1.3 objective of the study 4
1.4 research questions 4
1.5. Statement of hypothesis 5
1.6 Significance of the study 6
1.7 Scope of the study 7
1.8 limitation of the study 7
1.9 Definitions of terms 8
CHAPTER TWO
2.0. Literature review 10
2.1. Introduction – the cradle of ethnicity 10
2.2 Nigerian ethnicity varied 10
2.3 The ethnic minority groups 16
2.4 Democratic principles 17
2.5 Some unique
principles and elements of
democracy
18
2.6 Inter ethnic
struggle for political power 20
2.7 Elections in
the fourth republic 21
2.8 Conceptual
issues on ethnicity and
democratic principles. 23
2.9 Theoretical issues 25
Reference 27
CHAPTER THREE
- Research design and methodology 29
3.1 Introduction 29
3.2. Research design
29
3.3. Sources/method of data collection 30
3.4. Population and sample size 30
3.5. Sample technique 30
3.6. Validity/ reliability of measuring instrument 31
3.7. Method of data analysis 31
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0. Presentation and analysis of data 33
4.1. Introduction 33
4.2. Presentation of data 34
4.3. Analysis of data 35
4.4 Test of Hypothesis 43
4.5 Interpretation of result (s) 44
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0. Summary, conclusion and recommendation 47
5.1. Introduction 47
5.2. Summary of findings 48
5.3. Conclusion 49
5.4. Recommendations 49
References 51
Appendix I 53
Appendix II 54
CHAPTER ONE
1.0. INTRODUCTION
1.1. BACKGROUND
OF THE STUDY
This
research can simply be viewed within the Nigerian context; ethnicity is very
closely associated with a strong belief in a perceived cultural and linguistic
diversity of the country. It is often regarded as the inevitable consequence of
socio-cultural differences. With reference to Nigeria
within 1999 – 2011 democratic dispensation, Nigeria can be seen as a “mere
geographical expression” a “heterogeneous” society or as having a federal
character Okwudiba (1980)
Indeed
many Nigerians regard ethnicity as bio-cultural phenomenon arising from the
more existence of various cultural groups within the same polity. However, it
is common to interpret the other administrative discrimination observed in
Nigerian politics in tribal terms. According to Akin, tribalism “is perceived
to be the central unifying concept for the analysis of African not only
Nigerian life”.
Much
have been viewed, observed, gathered and put down in the trace of the effect of
ethnicity in democratic principle in Nigeria
towards ethnic politics of Nigeria.
This dispensation 1999-2011 at which ethnic factor have been based, each ethnic
group irrespective of size, wants to be
autonomous in regards to its internal affairs.
The
chapter suggested among other things, the creation of more autonomous
communities and guest for more states in the country as a means of allaying
fear of ethnic minority and enhances development in the country. However, this
ethnic ideology in itself needs to be explained. It cannot, therefore be made a
decisive independent variable several factors therefore attempt to explain the
ethnic phenomenon in Nigeria.
First,
may be ethnic sentiments aflamed by bringing it to the fore front of the consciousness
of the reading population. Second it may generate decisive inter ethnic
controversy. Ethnicity is a very sensitive issue in the nation politics in its
interpretation. It may be regarded by some ethnic ideologies as casting
aspirations on their ethnic groups. In other case, the net effect is an
unintended growth in ethnic tension.
A
focus on ethnicity tends to make a very significant variable in considering the
nature of democratic principles in Nigerian government and politics. Thus,
knowing clearly well that it is the loss of confidence, by the ethnic group in
the democratic principles over the years that have paved way for the politics
and governance which many have site as ethnic dilemma.
However,
no wonder Tony said “I feel it sounds so ridiculous and of course a murder to
our hard earned democracy that people tribalism which stand to militate against
our stability in democratic government”. Donaba, a resident of Lagos state
could write affirming that Igbos are brewing crisis in Lagos state – THIS DAY
February 20, 2001 simply because the voice of Ndigbo feels that it is high time
they take a shot at the highest office in Logos state.
Finally,
one should not conclude that the act of ethnic crisis is just from a particular
tribe but out of ethnic fight for survival in the recent democracy. In as much
as there is no way geographical extractions cannot afford to do without bloc
politics.