TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page………………………………………………………………………………………….i
Certification……………………………………………………………………………………….ii
Approval Page……………………………………………………………………………………iii
Dedication………………………………………………………………………………………..iv
Acknowledgement………………………………………………………………………………..v
Table of contents…………………………………………………………………………………vi
Appendixes………………………………………………………………………………………viii
List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………………..ix
Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………..x
CHAPTER
ONE: INTRODUCTION
Background of the Study…………………………………………………………………………1
Statement of the Problem………………………………………………………11
Purpose of the study………………………………………………………………12
Significance of the Study…………………………………………………………13
Scope of the Study……………………………………………………………………………….15
Research Questions………………………………………………………………………………15
Hypotheses………………………………………………………………………….……………16
CHAPTER
TWO: THE REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Conceptual Framework…………………………………………………….17
Factors that influence job satisfaction and motivation………………………..22
Relevance of motivation to satisfaction………………………………….25
Factor Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………..26
Instrument Development……………………………………………………31
Theoretical Framework…………………………………………………..34
Theories of job satisfaction…………………………………………………………34
Empirical Studies…………………………………………………………………………………38
Related Research Studies on job satisfaction …………………………42
Empirical studies on school ownership status and job satisfaction…………43
Empirical studies on gender and job satisfaction………………………45
Summary of Review of Literature……………………………….50
CHAPTER
THREE: RESEARCH METHOD
Research Design………………………………………………………………………………….53
Area of the Study…………………………………………………………………………………53
Population of the Study………………………………………………..54
Sample and Sampling Technique……………………………………….…. 54
Instrumentation…………………………………………………………………………….
.. …55
Validation of Instrument……………………………………………………56
Trial Testing of the Instrument……………………………………………..…57
Reliability of the Instrument…………………………………………………..58
Method of Data Collection…………………………………………………….58
Method of Data Analysis…………………………………………………………59
CHAPTER
FOUR: PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
Research Questions……………………………………………………..60
Research Questions and Hypotheses…………………………………………..61
Summary of Presentation of Results…………………………………………..83
CHAPTER
FIVE: DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION, IMPLICATIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND
SUMMARY
Discussion of findings…………………………………………………………………85
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………….90
Implications………………………………………………………………………………………92
Recommendations………………………………………………………………………………..93
Limitations of the study………………………………………………………….94
Suggestions for Further Research……………………………………………………..95
Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………95
REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………………98
APPENDICES
Appendix 1: Second Version of Job Satisfaction Scale for Teachers (JSST)…………… ………………………… ………………………… ………………………… …105
Appendix II: Final Version of Job Satisfaction Scale for Teachers (JSST) used after factor Analysis ………………………………………………111
Appendix III: Distribution of Permanent Secondary School Teachers Education Zones in Niger State……………………………………………114
Appendix IV: Summary of the Item of JSST that survived factor loading in the three extracted factors,………………………………………………….115
Appendix V: Summary of the factor Loadings of the Surviving Thirty Six Items of JSST in their Clusters………………………………………116
Appendix VI: Scree plot for number of factors extracted after factor Analysis……… ………………………… ………………………… ……….117
Appendix VII: Reliability coefficient of the thirty six items of JSST…… ………………………… ………………………… ………………………… ……………..118
Appendix VIII: Reliability coefficient of 104 items of JSST during trial testing of instrument…………………………………………119
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
1. Varimax rotated factor loadings of the items of JSST………………….60
2. Reliability Analysis Scale (Cronbach) on salary. ……………………………….65
3. Reliability Analysis Scale of Administration and Supervision……….66
4. Reliability Analysis Scale of Motivation …………………………….63
5. Reliability Analysis Scale of working condition/Availability of resources… ………………………… ………………………… ………………………… …69
6. Reliability Analysis Scale of Nature of work………………70
7. Reliability Analysis Scale (Cronbach) of JSST………………………….71
8. Mean responses of male and female teachers on JSST……………..72
9. Independent – test analysis in the mean responses of male and female teachers of Secondary Schools on JSST…………………………………………….73
10. Mean responses of teachers’ job satisfaction from three different school ownership statuses. ………………………………………………………….74
11a One-way ANOVA of the mean responses of school ownership (Cluster 1: salary)…………………………………………………….75
11b Post Hoc tests (Scheffe) on mean differences of school ownership status of teachers on salary. ………………………………………76
12a: One-way ANOVA on the mean responses of school ownership status (Cluster 2: Administration and Supervision)……………………77
12b: post Hoc Tests of one-way ANOVA of 12a……………………..77
13a: One-way ANOVA test of significance in the mean responses of schools on motivation… ………………………… ………………………… .78
13b. Post Hoc Test for significance of mean difference on motivation…… ………………………… …….79
14a. One-way ANOVA analysis on test of significance in the mean responses of school ownership status (Cluster 4: working conduction/Availability of Resources)……………… ………………………… ………………………… …80
14b: Post Hoc Test on mean significant difference on working condition/Availability of resources………………………………….81
15.a One-way ANOVA analysis on test of significance in the mean responses of school ownership status (Cluster 5: The Nature of Work)…….82
15b: Post HOC Tests for the significant
mean difference on the Nature of work…………………………………………………………………………………………….83
Abstract
This study was designed
to develop and validate an instrument for measuring job satisfaction among
secondary school teachers in Niger State. The study sought to examine the job
satisfaction level of teachers from the federal, state and private owned
secondary schools and the influence of gender of the teachers on job
satisfaction. The researcher utilized instrumentation research design. A
questionnaire ‘’Job Satisfaction Scale for Teachers’’ (JSST) made up of 72
items was developed and administered to a population of 1400 secondary school
teachers drawn randomly from Seven Education Zones of Niger State through
multi- stage sampling procedure. Five research questions and two null
hypotheses were used to guide the study. Data collected with the draft copy of
the instrument were subjected to construct validation using factor analysis
with Varimax rotation. Data were also analyzed using Cronbach Alpha (α) and
descriptive statistics of t-test, mean and standard deviation. One-way analysis
of variance (ANOVA) was also used for analysis of mean job satisfaction of
schools. The results showed that teachers from federally owned schools were
more satisfied in their job than teachers from both the state and private
schools while the state school teachers showed more job satisfaction level than
their private schools counterparts. The result also exhibited a high level of
validity and reliability of the instrument JSST in measuring job satisfaction
of teachers. The result further revealed that gender of the teachers has no
influence in determining job satisfaction of the teachers. Finally the study
recommended that government and stakeholders in education should create
adequate predictors of job satisfaction such as improved salaries and other
fringe benefits in the secondary schools so as to promote teacher job
satisfaction.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Background to the study
Accomplishment of the goals of education and the objectives of teaching is possible when teachers are competent in teaching and do have satisfaction in their profession Accomplishment of the goals of education and the objectives of teaching is possible when teachers are competent in teaching and do have satisfaction in their profession . These two variables of competent and satisfaction are conceptually independent but practically interactive. However, in the past fifteen years or so, a number of crises bedeviled the secondary school system that escalated a number of personnel problems ranging from economic crisis that manifested in galloping inflation and the depression of workers’ wages. This led to mass exodus of teachers from the teaching profession to other sectors of the economy. Rao (2003) rightly pointed out that the quality or effectiveness of a teacher is considered to be associated with his attitudes towards his profession, his satisfaction with his values and adjustment in the job and professional interest. In fact, the relevance of job satisfaction of teachers is very crucial to the long-term growth of any educational system around the world.
Ololube
(2006) emphasized that there is an assumption that teachers’ agitations and
demands are beyond the resources of the Ministry of Education or the
government. As a result the government in Nigeria and the Nigerian Union of
Teachers (NUT) are in a constant stand-off over the increase in salaries,
benefits, and improvements in working conditions of teachers. The federal and
state governments have argued that the present economic realities in the
country cannot sustain the demanded increase in salaries, benefits, and improvements
in working conditions of the teachers. Specifically they argue that teachers’
demands are beyond the government resources.
There is a problem in the government’s
position concerning the job performance of the teachers. They accuse the
teachers of negligence, laziness, purposeful lethargy, and lack of dedication
and zeal to work. They further argue that teachers’ levels of efficiency and
effectiveness do not necessitate the constant request for salary increase,
incentives and better working conditions. While teachers on their part argue
that the existing salary structure, benefits and working conditions do not
satisfy their basic needs in as much as other sectors of the economy have
bigger structure, better motivation and enhanced working conditions. They feel
the economy is not properly balanced and managed, hence, their demands. But
teachers’ argument is in line with Adams’ (1963) equity theory of motivation.
Adams’ Equity Theory calls for a fair balance to be struck between employees’
inputs (e.g., hard work, skill levels, tolerance, and enthusiasm) and
employees’ outputs (e.g., salary, benefits, and intangibles such as
recognition). According to the theory’s tenet, a fair balance serves to ensure
a strong and productive relationship with the employees, with the overall
result being satisfied and therefore motivated employees. The theory is
built-on the belief that employees become demotivated, both in relation to
their job and their employer, if they feel as though their inputs are greater
than the outputs. Employees can be expected to respond to this in different
ways, including de-motivation (generally to the extent the employee perceives
the disparity between the inputs and the outputs exist), reduced effort,
becoming disgruntled, or, in more extreme cases, perhaps disruptive.
To
note is that the National policy on education from the Federal Republic of
Nigeria (FRN, 2004) stated that since no education system may rise above the
quality of its teachers, teacher education shall continue to be given major
emphasis in all educational planning and development” (FRN, 2004). According to
World Bank Special report on Education, standard of education in Africa is
threatened by the industrial conditions of the teaching staff. World Bank
Report (1988) records that despite the tremendous gains made by African
government over the past 30 years in increasing access to education, both at
lower and tertiary level, greater challenges lie ahead if the goals of higher
education are to be achieved. Stressing further, the report highlights fiscal
crises, academic instability, and poor industrial relation emanating from poor
conditions of service within the education system, as factors responsible for
falling standard of education. The emphasis of the report is that teaching
staff of the educational system should be provided with satisfactory job
conditions if the objective of the educational system is to be realized.
Teachers are expected to render a very high level of job performance, and the
Ministry of Education is always curious regarding the job performance of its
teachers. A very high measure of loyalty, patriotism, hard work, dedication and
commitment is always demanded by the Ministry (Ubom & Joshua, 2004). They
also stressed that the roles and contexts of educations’ motivational methods
and tools cannot be overemphasized because high motivation enhances
productivity which is naturally in the interests of all educational systems.
For our educational system to be something to reckon with, all the stakeholders
in education should embrace the job satisfaction of its employees.
Job satisfaction, as an
organizational pheonomenon has been cocneptualised from an array of
perspectives such as vocational needs, and instrinsic and extrinsic job rewards
(Lewin 1994). Atikson (1995), from the vocational need perspective, viewed job
satisfaction as the internally or externally aroused desire or urge to act in a
vocational setting in order to produce an effect, which is expected to prove
very beneficial to the actor. He further emphasized that there may be
individual differences which may influence interest and the extent of job
satisfaction in a given setting which therefore represent a test of the third
preposition of the adjustment theory. According to Lewin (1994), adjustment
theory states that satisfaction is a function of the correspondence between the
reinforced system of the work environment and the individual’s needs provided
that the individual’s abilities correspond with the ability requirements of the
work environment.
Crites (1994) conceptualized job satisfaction
from the intrinsic perspective as the pleasant stimulus that is obtained upon
the successful performance of a task. Also, as is the case with all
white-collar positions, there are intrinsic and extrinsic factors that affect a
teacher’s job satisfaction (Marianne & David, 1997). Intrinsic satisfaction
can come from classroom activities, daily interactions with students, student’s
characteristics and perceptions, autonomy and freedom of the teachers,
participative management, recognition and praise, career advancement,
belongingness, achievement and job significance. Extrinsic factors on the other
hand refer to salary, perceived support from administrators, school safety and
availability of school resources, comparison of outputs, job expectation, job
security and performance appraisal (Bobbitt, Leich, Whitener & Lynch, 1994; Choy, Bobbit,
Henke, Medrich, Lieberman, & Horn, 1993). While intrinsic factor force may
motivate people to become teachers, extrinsic conditions can influence their
satisfaction in this position and their desire to remain in teaching throughout
their career.
The proponents of intrinsic determinants of
job satisfaction argue that the satisfiers of an employment situation are
psychologically regulated. Pelz and Andrew (1987) elaborated that individual
employees have emotional structures, which must be maintained before an
individual can function effectively in any situation. They argued that every
emotional response reflects a dual value judgment, which portrays the
discrepancy or relation between what the individual wants including how much he
wants it. Like early psychologists noted, the inability of an individual to
realize these emotional demands may invariably distort his ego and the job
satisfaction in a given employment situation. Okoye (1995) stressing further on
this point asserted that the satisfaction of the ego has much to do with the
psychological devices and motivational behaviour of an individual. Job satisfaction,
which has been formally related to motivation, can therefore, be conceptualized
as the psychological dispensations of an employee to engage in a given job as a
result of the total or partial fulfillment of the intrinsic psychological
demands on an individual. To some extent, intrinsic factors may also relate to
physical factors in situations where the physical demands tend to influence
intrinsic motivation in an employment situation. This is because there is a
close relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and the extrinsic
factors tend to exert a powerful effect on intrinsic behaviour.
In their bid to discover what keeps teachers
happy in the teaching job, it was reported by Tanja and Emily (2003) that
gender, among other factors, does not have a significant bivariate relationship
with teacher satisfaction, but at the same time, teaching force is gradually
becoming more feminized, as evidenced by the fact that among younger teachers,
female teachers are in the majority. Okpara (2003) noted that the Nigerian
women are now assuming greater responsibilities in the management of business
organizations. Despite the barriers militating against their full participation
in the labor market, the economic climate in the country requires women to
augment the earnings of their husbands and parents. Therefore their
contributions to the nation’s economy cannot be overlooked and should be
assessed in the level of their satisfaction in the job they do.
From
a generalized view point, Morse (1993) defined job satisfaction as effective
response of an individual or employee toward liking or disliking his present
occupational position. It may be regarded as an internal predictor of job
satisfier equivalence, representing the individual’s appraisal of the extent to
which the work environment gratifies his needs. Job satisfaction as used in
earlier context refers to the extent personal wants both material and
psychological are realized by the individual while performing a task. In other
words, Sharma and Jerran described job satisfaction in Metu (2009) as an
effective reaction to an individual’s work situation. It can be defined also as
an overall feeling about one’s job or career in terms of specific facets of the
job or career e.g. compensation, autonomy, co-workers, and it can be related to
specific outcomes such as productivity (Rice, Gentile, & Mc Farlin, 1991). Teachers’ satisfaction with their
career may have strong implication for students’ learning, as supported by
Ossai (2004). He further stated that a teacher’s job satisfaction with his
career may influence quality and stability of instruction given to students.
Adelabu (2005 ) exploring teacher motivational issues in Nigeria showed that
teachers are poorly motivated and are dissatisfied with their living and
working conditions with the following key reasons: low wages when compared with
other professionals, low status in the society, mass promotion of teachers (
promoting teachers ‘en masse’, without basing it on an evaluation mechanism
linked to job performance has also been found to de-motivate many teachers in
Nigeria), lack of career advancement opportunities, high teacher-pupil/students
ratio, inadequate fringe benefits and irregular payment of teacher salaries.
According to Adelabu, these conditions are responsible for low teacher morale
and the difficulty in attracting and retaining quality personnel into the
teaching profession.
Maslow
(1954) in his framework of the hierarchy of needs specified that the categories
of needs in any organization are arranged in a hierarchy ranging from
physiological, security, social, esteem and self-actualizing needs and
satisfying the basic (physiological) needs called lower level needs is
important in order to avoid unpleasant feelings or consequences. Maslow further
noted that an individual’s behaviour and feeling of satisfaction within an
organizational framework is always influenced negatively if these needs remain
unfulfilled. The consequence of unfulfilled needs of teachers for secondary
education is the occurrence of tension within the teachers populace regardless
of the level at which the need occurs. Strike, lack of dedication to duty and
unaccomplishment of the aimed goals of secondary education may be bi-products
of unfulfilled needs.
The
importance of an efficient and well integrated teaching service in the
development of any nation can be hardly overemphasized. Uka cited in Enemuo
(2006) supported this assertion when he declared that on the health of the teaching
profession depends the health of the nation. Education is perhaps the ministry
with the largest number of employees in Nigeria and teaching service and
welfare of teachers need to be taken more seriously if lofty objectives of
education are to be achieved. There is no gain saying that every industrial
concern has the responsibility for fulfilling the three conditions that make
the progress of an establishment namely; to increase productivity, to promote
employee satisfaction and adjustment to work and curtail industrial strife.
Rao (2010) noted that the successful running
of any educational system depends mainly upon the teachers, the student, the
curriculum and the facilities. Of these, the teacher is the most important one
and is the pivot on whom the entire educational structure rests. Today, though
along with other professions like medicine, law and engineering, teaching is
also considered as a profession. It is said to be the noblest of all
professions but people do not think of the teacher as a professional worker in
the same sense, status and reverence in which they consider the doctor, the
lawyer and the engineer. Why is this so? It is because teachers are poorly paid
and their income is low. Also, other professionals can easily take up teaching
as a job to manage when there is no other work in their fields but teachers on
the reverse cannot be assigned to operate where a doctor or lawyer should be.
Or is it because the majority of the teachers are from the poor sections of the
society? Or is it because teachers have
failed to impress the society about the importance and the dignity of their
work? (Ramakrishnaiah, 2003).Ramakrishnaiah further emphasized that a large
number of teachers of the present day have no interest in their profession but they
continue in the profession only as mechanical wage earners. The facilities and
incentives offered in this profession are so meager that many of the talented
persons do not think of becoming but seek positions elsewhere.
Good
working condition and efficient management of teaching service ensure
successful implementation of the educational policies of any state. Rao and
Ramakrishnaiah (2004) remarked that a better understanding of the causes for
job satisfaction/dissatisfaction of teachers is desirable not because it will
enable them to be made completely satisfied but because it may help the
administrators to relieve that intense and painful dissatisfaction which
injures both the individual and the society in which he lives. The teacher has
a powerful and abiding influence in the formation of the character of every
future citizen. He acts as a pivot for the transmission of intellectual and
technical skills and cultural traditions from one generation to the other.
Therefore teachers should be allowed to face their work with zeal and
dedication. The cry of teachers has been
turned into the slogan that teachers reward is in heaven. The slogan seems to
have negatively affected the teachers demand for improved condition of services
and greater representation in formulating matters affecting them.
In the same vein, Adelabu (2005) reported that
Nigeria has a highly decentralized system of education due to its federal
system of government which led to the absence of a single tier of government to
have absolute control of public education. This therefore made it unclear who
is solely responsible for payment of teachers’ salaries. In the past, the
payment of teacher’s salaries was rotated between the federal, state and local
government. According to the Nigeria Union of Teachers (NUT), this uncertainty
has affected teachers ‘morale. Adelabu further noted that one respondent
commented that it is common to see advertisements for houses to rent with the
added remark, “not for teachers”. There have also been occasions when teachers’
salaries have been diverted to meet expenditures in other sectors of
government. Consequently, teachers have been forced to engage in other sources
of income as male teachers go into farming even working as labourers on farms
owned by the parents of their students while their female counterparts resort
to small trading enterprises. The pity is that it is only teachers that can be
treated this way. A Ministry of Education official corroborated the view that
uncertainty about who the true employers of school teachers are has lowered job
satisfaction and motivation but also noted that the situation is improving. The
fact is that teachers should have lush morale on their work because morale is a
function of job satisfaction which increases spirit and appreciation of the
work they render to the society. It is a function of belongingness, rationality
and identification. Ibiam in Metu (2009) said that in every society, the
teacher is number one; without the teacher, there would be no doctors, lawyers,
no engineers etc. So the teacher should be seen and considered first. In his
care lie the children and youths of the society.
Ololube (2007) asserted that because of the
central position occupied by teachers in the educational system, the need to
explore their job satisfaction is very crucial. According to him, the major
factor that is associated with teachers’ decision to leave or remain in the
teaching profession is their satisfaction or dissatisfaction. The individual
feelings of satisfaction may arise as a result of several factors such as
financial and professional security, a feeling of belonging, pleasant working
conditions, recognition of the work well done, involvement in policy
formulation that affect one and impartial treatment among others. With teachers,
satisfaction with career may have strong implications for student learning.
Some studies argue that teachers who do not feel supported in their work may be
less motivated to do their best work in the classroom and that highly satisfied
teachers are less likely to change schools or to leave the teaching profession
than those who are dissatisfied with many areas of their work life (Ostroff,
Choy & Bobbit in Colette 2009).
In view of the fact that teacher’s level of
job satisfaction correlates positively with teacher’s classroom effectiveness
(Ololube, 2007), and in view of the fact that teachers’ classroom effectiveness
correlates positively with students achievement (Ibiam, 1995), there is the
need to investigate the factors that determine teachers’ job satisfaction. Even
though it has been well acknowledged that issues pertaining to job satisfaction
and productivity of secondary school teachers have been well researched by
researchers, it must also be appreciated that the validity of most of these research
findings in secondary school teachers’ job satisfaction has been inherently
questionable. This is because of the paucity of a standard measuring instrument
for secondary school teachers job satisfaction. And because of the fact that
these teachers are of varying characteristics in terms of gender behaviour of
employee, ownership status of school taught, teaching experience of the
teacher, professional interest and attitude of the teacher, motivation of the
teacher in teaching, students per teacher ratio, teaching in different
communities and different school sizes, etc., it may be argued that the
responses of the secondary school teachers on teachers job satisfaction scale
may be influenced or even be dependent on these variables.
Considering the current emphasis on effective teaching for an enhanced academic performance of the students and for the realization of the objectives of secondary school education, it has become obviously necessary that a valid and reliable job satisfaction instrument be developed. This will make studies in teachers’ job satisfaction more feasible and locally-oriented.