ANALYSIS OF THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF INCOME TAX ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE STRATEGY FOR REVENUE GENERATION IN NIGERIA

CHAPTER ONE GENERAL INTRODUCTION

       Background to the study

Taxation may be defined as the demand by the government of a country on its citizens for a compulsory payment of part of their wealth. The aim of taxation is to raise revenue to finance government expenditure to achieve economic development and to distribute income on a socially acceptable basis. Hence, the first need of a modern government is revenue which is indeed the breath of its nostrils¹. Expenditure has shown that connection is not a simple task, especially in developing countries like Nigeria where its economics, social and political structure is so complicated. Tax has to be collected with caution as voluntary compliance is lacking. Income tax and every other form of taxation have not being readily accepted and even where it is accepted, it is not favoured. Members of the public are usually touchy about forms, notice and letters tax authorities. The result is an attempt to create or avoid taxes as much as possible, causing a low rate of the compliance.

It is necessary at this juncture to distinguish between: ―tax evasion‖ and ―tax avoidance‖, either of which could be the result of non compliance with payment of ― tax evasion is usually defined to mean the failure to pay one‘s tax or the reduction of one‘s tax liability through illegal or fraudulent return or failure to make a return or even failure to pay on time. Evasion is not only wrong, but also it involves breach of tax laws. Ola C.S, opined that:

Tax avoidance is the minimization of tax liability by arranging one‘s affair as to take advantage of provision in the tax law.²In this way the tax payer pay less than otherwise would have been payable.

Income tax is wholly the creature of statute. That is to say, there is no common law of taxation. No principles of law are applicable other than those principles, which are found in the taxing Acts themselves according to their true meaning and effect. In any tax case, it is consequently necessary for the court or tax commissioners to determine the true meaning and effect of the particular statutory provisions in question. The actual problem in connection with tax administration is that of enforcing tax payment. It is against this background that the Personal Income Tax Act of 1993 (as amended) as well as Companies Income Tax Act of 1990 (as amended) made penal provisions against any violations of their provisions. These are categorized into civil and criminal offences and penalties.

The Personal Income Tax Act³, (P.I.T.A) for instance, lays down income tax offences and penalties for their breach, such as legal proceedings, distraint of property, public auction of seized properties and monetary penalties for various income tax offences.⁴ Likewise, part XXI of Companies Income Tax Act (C.I.T.A) 1990, (as amended) listed various offences and penalties against any tax defaulter such as failure to comply with the provisions of C.I.T.A or rules, failure to comply with notices or summons, failure to answer questions on tax matters, failure to furnish returns, statement, information or keep correct records of income.⁵

Preliminary examination of these penal provisions reveal their ineffectiveness to check the activities of tax defaulters. This study is to examine and analyse the penal provisions with a view to suggest better methods of making effective penal provisions in our tax statutes.