AN APPRAISAL OF THE APPLICATION OF PLEA BARGAINING PROCEDURE IN NIGERIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

AN APPRAISAL OF THE APPLICATION OF PLEA BARGAINING PROCEDURE IN NIGERIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

CHAPTER ONE

GENERAL INTRODUCTION 

1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE RESEARCH
There are certain key decisions that people who are being prosecuted have to make: one of the most important decisions is to plead guilty. It is „plea bargain‟ when the accused pleads guilty in return for an offer by the prosecution or when the sitting judge has informally made it known that he will minimize the sentence if the accused pleads guilty with plea bargaining the process shifts the focus from the judge leavingthe negotiation to prosecutor and the accused or the accused‟s counsel. Practically, it may prevent a public finding of the facts and substitute it with a behind-the scenes cut short. In this case a deal is usually made between the prosecutor and the accused, whereby the prosecution  may offer to drop more serious charge(s) against the accused in exchange for guilty plea of a lesser charge(s) and the prosecution and the accused come to an agreement to solve the case.

At the resolve of the case both parties, the prosecutor and the accused tend to achieve one thing, saving of time and reduction of costs.

There is need to begin and conclude trials expeditiously, decongest the prisons, reduce the time and financial cost of criminal investigations and trials still maintain and observe fundamental human rights principle without much ado; laying credence to the above, the concept of plea bargaining apparently seems to be one of the procedures that would assist the Nigerian criminal justice system to achieve these laudable objectives.

However, the concept “plea Bargaining” has generated a lot of arguments amongst members of the bench, bar, law enforcements agencies, the academic community and the public at large in Nigeria and it is this event of argument at various levels that generated the interest of the researcher to delve into this controversial area of study so as to make an attempt in ascertaining the proper position of the law.

These arguments today arose from the seemingly increasing use of plea bargaining by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission of Nigeria (EFCC) which the enabling Economic and Financial Crimes Commission Act[1]

Controversially Supports.

Many people have argued in Nigeria that the practice of plea bargaining by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission allows offenders to receive insignificant punishment that will undermine deterrent aspect of criminal sanctions. Some also believe that offenders can evade the law, provided they are willing to bargain. Equally, some have argued that the practice circumvent the rigorous standards of “proof beyond reasonable doubt” imposed on the prosecution during criminal trials. Some people also believe that the application of plea bargaining comprises the fundamental principles enshrined in the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999[2].

Against the above backdrops, therefore, the objectives of this research therefore is to identify the mode of practices of plea bargain in Nigeria and the inadequacies in the subject matter accounting for the controversy and to finally proffer measures needed for the pro activeness of the law where necessary so as to meet up with the unchallenged practice in other jurisdictions.

1.2    STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM 
The following problems are identified in the research:

i.Thelegal justification of section 14 (2) of the economic and Financial Crimes Act, Cap El, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 which the economic and Financial Crimes commission (hereinafter referred to as the commission) uses as a framework for their use of plea bargaining in the prosecution of their landmark cases of corruption and financial crimes

being that there is no express provision for a pleabargaining in any of the Federal Criminal Legislations in Nigeria.

1.3   AIM AND OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCH  
This research aims at ascertaining the applicability of the concept of plea bargain in the penal system, through and examination of the legal and institutional frameworks on the subject matter in Nigeria. In view of this therefore, the objectives of this paper are as follows.

i.An examination of the practice and mode of plea bargain in Nigeria visà-vis the adequacy or otherwise the inadequacies of the laws regulating plea bargain in Nigeria. ii. An examination of the factors militating against the practice of plea bargain in Nigeria  iii.Finally, to profer measures for addressing the problems identified in the course of the study so as to have a smooth operation of plea bargain in Nigeria like other jurisdictions.

 1.4 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RESEARCH 
This research will be of immense help to students, academics, policy makers, the bench and particularly litigation lawyers to ascertain the proper law on the subject matter. It will also be of great importance to graft agencies in Nigeria particularly the economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Independent Corrupt Practice and other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) and the general public by giving them certainty on the mode of application and practice of plea  bargain as the relevant institution on the subject matter in Nigeria.

[1] Cap E1, laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2014

[2] The Constitution of Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999

AN APPRAISAL OF THE APPLICATION OF PLEA BARGAINING PROCEDURE IN NIGERIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM