ABSTRACT
It
is no gain saying that Nigerian banking and financial system has undergone
remarkable changes over the years, in terms of the number of institutions,
ownership structure, as well as the scale of operations driven largely by the
deregulation of the financial sector in line with the global trend. The aim of
the study is to analyze impediments, determine and ascertain the causes of
resistance to changes in strategic management practices by bank management as
well as proffer solutions on eliminating such impediments to strategic
management practices in Nigerian banking sector. In this study, descriptive
statistics was used to describe quality and quantity raw data on the
impediments to strategic management in the Nigerian banking industry. It is
important to note that a thorough understanding of descriptive statistics is
essential for effective use of all normative and cause-and-effect statistical
techniques, including hypothesis testing, correlation, and regression
analysis. In conclusion, the result of
the analysis ‘showed that banks have really developed new ideas to contend with
impediments to strategic management
through new technology, new products and services, competent human
resources and strategic branch locations to enhance performance and
profitability.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page i
Certification ii
Dedication iii
Acknowledgement iv
Abstract v
List of Tables
CHAPTER ONE – INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the
Study 1
1.2 Introduction of
Banking System in Nigeria 4
1.3 Statement of the
Problem 7
1.4 Objectives of the
Study 9
1.5 Research Questions 9
1.6 Hypothesis of the
study 10
1.7 Scope of the Study 10
1.8 Significance of the
Study 11
References 12
CHAPTER TWO – REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1 Theoretical Review 14
2.2 Empirical literature 29
References 39
CHAPTER THREE – METHODOLOGY OF THE RESEARCH
3.1 Research Design 41
3.2 Sources of Data 41
3.3 Population/Sample
Derivation 42
3.4 Instrument for Data
Analysis 44
3.5 Method of Data
Analysis 45
References 46
CHAPTER FOUR – DATA/RESULT ANALYSIS
4.1 Data Presentation and
Interpretation 47
4.2 Implications of
Results/Analysis 48
References 60
CHAPTER FIVE – SUMMARY,
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary 61
5.2 Conclusion 61
5.3 Recommendations 62
Appendix
Bibliography 63
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1: Composition of the management staff of the banks 42
Table 3.2: Determination of each Banks Sample Size 44
Table 3.3: Questionnaire Distribution and Responses 47
Table 4.2.1: Application of Strategic Management Approach in Nigerian
banks 49
Table 4.2.2: Impediments to Strategic Management in Nigerian Banks 52
Table 4.2.3: Resistances to change as Impediment to Strategic Management in Nigerian Banks 55
Table 4.2.4: Impact of Poor Strategic Planning as Impediment to the
performance of Nigerian Banks 57
Table 4.2.5: Solutions to the
Impediments to Strategic Management in Banks 58
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Strategic management is a field that deals with the major intended and emergent initiatives taken by general managers on behalf of owners, involving utilization of resources, to enhance the performance of firms in their external environments (Nag et al,2007). It entails specifying the organization’s mission, vision and objectives, developing policies and plans, often in terms of projects and programs, which are designed to achieve these objectives, and then allocating resources to implement the policies and plans, projects and programs (Johnson and Scholes, 2008). A balanced scorecard is often used to evaluate the overall performance of the business and its progress towards objectives. Recent studies and leading management theorists have advocated that strategy needs to start with stakeholders expectations and use a modified balanced score card which includes all stakeholders. Strategic management is a level of managerial activity under setting goals and over tactics.
Strategic management provides overall direction to the enterprise and is closely related to the field of Organization Studies. In the field of business administration it is useful to talk about “strategic alignment” between the organization and its environment or “strategic consistency”. According to Arieu (2007), “there is strategic consistency when the actions of an organization are consistent with the expectations of management, and these in turn are with the market and the context.” Strategic management includes not only the management team but can also include the Board of Directors and other stakeholders of the organization. It depends on the organizational structuredified balanced scorecard Strategic management is an ongoing process that evaluates and controls the business and the industries in which the company is involved; assesses its competitors and sets goals and strategies to meet all existing and potential competitors; and then reassesses each strategy annually or quarterly to determine how it has been implemented and whether it has succeeded or needs replacement by a new strategy to meet changed circumstances, new technology, new competitors, a new economic environment., or a new social, financial, or political environment (Lamb, 1984) which includes all stakeholders.
According to Bracker
(1980), “although different definitions of strategic management have been
proposed there appears to be a common focus among scholars about the key
aspects or elements that form the current structure of strategic management”. Thompson, et. al. (2008), and Dobes and
Starkey (2006) propose the elements of strategic management to include
strategic analysis, strategic choice and strategy implementation. Dess and
Miller (1993) and Lynch (2000) argued that strategic management involves
environmental and capability analysis, strategy formulation and strategy
implementation and control on an on-going basis. Boyd and Reunning – Elliot
(1998) identify mission statement, trend analysis, competitor analysis, long-term
goals, annual goals, short-term action plans and on-going evaluation as the key
indicators that can be used to measure the strategic planning and management
construct.
Banks have a strategic role to play
in the nation‘s economic development. This is hinged on their basic function as
financial intermediaries, mobilizing vital savings from surplus economic units
and channeling same to deficits units. An efficient financial system is widely
accepted as a necessary condition for an effective functioning of a nation’s
economy. The state of development of the financial market in a country serves
as barometer for measuring the stage of development of the economy. The mix of
these financial intermediaries varies from country to country, reflecting the
stage of development and the degree of sophistication of the country’s economic
agents (Abdullahi, 2003). Thus, it is imperative that the banking system be
healthy in order to fulfill its many expectations, chief among which is the
provision of the financial catalyst for the attainment of economic progress,
reduction in poverty and general improvement in the living standard of the
people (Eboreime, 2009)
A review of developments in the
Nigerian banking and financial system indicates that the banking sector has undergone
remarkable changes over the years, in terms of the number of institutions,
ownership structure, as well as the scale of operations driven largely by the
deregulation of the financial sector in line with the global trend (Ogunleye,
2005). As at the end of 2004, insured banks stood at 89 with various sizes and
degrees of soundness. The sector generally enjoyed a stable operating
environment until the July 6, 2004 announcement of the CBN which introduced a
major policy initiative affecting the sector.
1.2 INTRODUCTION OF BANKING SYSTEM IN
NIGERIA
The
banking operation began in Nigeria in 1892 under the control of the expatriates
and by 1945, some Nigerians and Africans had established their own banks. The
first era of consolidation ever recorded in Nigeria banking industry was
between 1959-1969. This was occasioned by bank failures during 1953- 1959 due
mainly to liquidity of banks (Somoye, 2008). Banks, then, do not have enough
liquid assets to meet customers demand. There was no well-organized financial
system with enough financial instruments to invest in. Hence, banks merely
invested in real assets which could not be easily realized to cash without loss
of value in times of need. This prompted the Federal Government then, backed by
the World Bank Report to institute the Lyons commission on September 1958. The
outcome was the promulgation of the ordinance of 1958, which established the
Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).
The
year 1959 was remarkable in the Nigeria Banking history not only because of the
establishment of Central Bank Nigeria (CBN) but that the Treasury Bill
Ordinance was enacted which led to the issuance of our first treasury bills in
April, 1960. The period (1959–1969) marked the establishment of formal money,
capital markets and portfolio management in Nigeria. In addition, the company
acts of 1968 were established. This period could be said to be the genesis of
serious banking regulation in Nigeria. With the CBN in operation, the minimum
paid-up capital was set at N400, 000(USD$480,000) in 1958. By January 2001,
banking sector was fully deregulated with the adoption of universal banking system
in Nigeria which merged Merchant bank operation to Commercial banks system
preparatory towards consolidation programme in 2004(Somoye,2008).
The proliferation
of banks in the 1990s which also resulted in the failure of many of them, led
to another recapitalization exercise that saw bank’s capital being increased to
N500million(USD$5.88) and subsequently N2billion(US$0.0166billion) in 2004 with the institution of a 13-point
reform agenda aimed at addressing the fragile nature of the banking system,
stop the boom and burst cycle that characterized the sector and evolve a
banking system that not only could serve the Nigeria economy, but also the regional
economy (Somoye, 2008). The author explained that the agenda by the monetary
authorities is also agenda to consolidate the Nigeria banks and make them
capable of playing in international financial system. However, there appears to
be divergent between the state of the banking
industry in Nigeria vis-à-vis the vision of the government and regulatory
authorities for the industry. This, in the main, was the reason for the policy
of mandatory consolidation, which was not open to dialogue and its components also
seemed cast in concrete (Somoye, 2008).
The Nigerian banking environment has witnessed tremendous changes before and during the global financial crisis with a gradual transformation from transactional orientation to customer service-orientation in an increasingly aggressive environment (Okwuosah, 2009). However, customers say the banks of their choice are those with national presence whose network are nationwide such that withdrawal and deposits could be made anywhere in the country, as most Nigerians are gradually losing the desire to carry cash around. This also explains the reason why most customers prefer banks with efficient online banking facilities, most of the banks that have these facilities would attract quite a sizable number of customers, which means if customers all come at the same time queuing is inevitable hence yet customers say they do not like to queue. They desire strong banks that would reply their e-mails promptly with great public relations, prompt issuance of bank statements, less charge on online services, prompt attention to opening online account, quick activation of accounts, friendly approach, and efficient customer service (Asikhia, 2007).