A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THOMAS HOBBES’S SOCIAL CONTRACT WITH JOHN LOCKE’S SOCIAL CONTRACT IN THEIR POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pages
Title Page i
Approval ii
Dedication iii
Acknowledgement iv
Table of Content v
Abstract vii
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 DEFINITION OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 1
1.2 NATURE OF SOCIAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 1
1.3 METHODS IN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 5
1.4 POLITICAL OBLIGATION AND ITS PROBLEM 6
1.5 CONCLUSION 15
CHAPTER TWO
THOMAS HOBBES POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
2.0 INTRODUCTION 17
2.1 THOMAS HOBBES POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 17
2.2 THOMAS HOBBES STATE OF NATURE 18
2.3 SOCIAL CONTRACT BY THOMAS HOBBES 22
2.4 AN ASSESSMENT OF THOMAS HOBBES POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 27
2.5 CONCLUSION 30
CHAPTER THREE
JOHN LOCKE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
3.0 INTRODUCTION 31
3.1 JOHN LOCKE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 31
3.2 JOHN LOCKE ON THE STATE OF NATURE 33
3.3 SOCIAL CONTRACT BY JOHN LOCKE 37
3.4 AN ASSESSMENT OF JOHN LOCKE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 39
3.5 CONCLUSION 40
CHAPTER FOUR
COMPARISON AND CONTRASTING OF THE TWO PHILOSOPHER’S IDEAS OF SOCIAL CONTRACT THEORY
4.0 INTRODUCTION 42
4.1 COMPARISON OF HOBBES’ AND LOCKE’S IDEAS OF SOCIAL CONTRACT 42
4.2 CONTRASTING HOBBES’ AND LOCKE’S IDEAS OF SOCIAL CONTRACT 44
4.3 AN ASSESSMENT OF THE TWO PHILOSOPHER’S POLITICAL IDEAS 48
4.4 CONCLUSION 50
BIBLIOGRAPH
ABSTRACT
This essaycritically examines the theory of social contract as seen and conceived by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Also, it posits to tackle certain questions like: a) Does the theory of social contract in Thomas Hobbes share any similarity with that of John Locke? b) Do they contrast at any point at all? c) Can it be said that the social contract theory according to the two philosophers under consideration is completely the same?
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke also saw it from different perspectives to a certain level. Hobbes, the first to give its full exposition and defence postulates that social contract is an agreement to which the people surrender their will, freedom, and power to an absolute sovereign called the Leviathan. Thomas Hobbes saw the contract as one in which the citizens relinquish their freedom inherent in the state of nature to an absolute sovereign. For John Locke, who came after Hobbes, conceived social contract to exist wherever some citizens united into one body having a common established law and judicature to appeal to with authority to decide controversies between them and punish offenders. The problem consequently hinges in the confusion and difference inherent in trying to understand the two philosophers’ theory of social contract.
The method of this research work shall be expository and analytical. I intend to expose the different views of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke on social contract. Since social contract theory does not mean exactly the same thing to both of them. After the exposition of their thoughts, a comparison and a contrast and critical evaluation will follow.
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction
Social and political philosophy are both closely related fields of philosophy generally dealing with the role of the individual in the society, as well as the role of government. Social and political philosophy is the philosophical study of question about social behaviour and it addresses a wide range of subjects, from individual to legitimacy of laws, from the social contract to criteria for revolution and it attempts to understand the patterns and changes of societies. It studies the questions about the government, liberty and the enforcement of legal code by authority: what they are? Why they are needed? What form should it should take and what duties citizens owe to a legitimate government?[1]
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THOMAS HOBBES’S SOCIAL CONTRACT WITH JOHN LOCKE’S SOCIAL CONTRACT IN THEIR POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY